TVphotog
Television Grunt
I don't think that the rigid I-50 is bad persay, just cosmetically challenged in my eyes. I really would like a non-rigid version for portability and compactness. With the collapsible the Z6 becomes a pocket camera.
robbiechad
RobbieChad
robbiechad
RobbieChad
robbiechad
RobbieChad
Spider67
Well-known
Hi raid,
A beautiful portrait. The combination of an Industar and colour film is interesting.
Thanks for your BW shots Robbie (sad that Aldi has reached GB...it looks somehow misplaced)!
"What is wrong with the rigid version? It is ugly, but is very sharp"
I accepted the minimum aperture of 3,5 only because it is collapsible. But if I see the rigid version I don't know if I could resist to buy it.
A beautiful portrait. The combination of an Industar and colour film is interesting.
Thanks for your BW shots Robbie (sad that Aldi has reached GB...it looks somehow misplaced)!
"What is wrong with the rigid version? It is ugly, but is very sharp"
I accepted the minimum aperture of 3,5 only because it is collapsible. But if I see the rigid version I don't know if I could resist to buy it.
raid
Dad Photographer
Hi Robbie,
All shots are sharp and I cannot see any differences from what is posted. These FSU lenses are bargains.
Hi Spider,
Thanks. I have noticed that many users of FSU lenses do mainly B&W work. These lenses are also good for color. I noted the same for the old Elmar 5cm/3.5 lens that is mainly used for B&W. It renders beautiful pastel colors.
Raid
All shots are sharp and I cannot see any differences from what is posted. These FSU lenses are bargains.
Hi Spider,
Thanks. I have noticed that many users of FSU lenses do mainly B&W work. These lenses are also good for color. I noted the same for the old Elmar 5cm/3.5 lens that is mainly used for B&W. It renders beautiful pastel colors.
Raid
Last edited:
Share: