Ororaro
Well-known
I love the summarit!
And one with the Super-Angulon.


And one with the Super-Angulon.

Ororaro
Well-known
Thanks Eric!
I'm having a hard time understanding what I like and dislike about this new film I'm shooting (Agfa Silver Tone- AKA Apx-400)! I hope I get the hang of it soon because I have 30 left to shoot...
I'm having a hard time understanding what I like and dislike about this new film I'm shooting (Agfa Silver Tone- AKA Apx-400)! I hope I get the hang of it soon because I have 30 left to shoot...
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Looks like you might want to rate it a little slower Ned- perhaps 250?
Ororaro
Well-known
sepiareverb said:Looks like you might want to rate it a little slower Ned- perhaps 250?
I read about it, too. However, I haven't noticed the speed to be a problem. My negatives are superb. My scans are lacking and this is what worries me.
I'll definitely have to print some in my darkoom for a full appreciation of this film.
HSI
The Fourth
I hate watermarks like no other, but the lens renders some beautiful negatives.
Likewise try pushing some APX to 1600, see what the results are like.
Likewise try pushing some APX to 1600, see what the results are like.
rodneyAB
Established
Ned..i like photograph #2 a lot.
Ororaro
Well-known
Thanks, Rod!
peterm1
Veteran
You should try colour work with this lens. It is low contrast and I find I like the colour results. Tends to pick up more shadow detail too.
telenous
Well-known
I like the original Summarit a lot too. My sample is mechanically bruised and battered and there's a tiny bit of fogging, so it is not really representative of what the lens does when clean. But even so, it has given me photos I like. Certainly one of the great characters in the Leitz line-up of lenses of old.
First inline post, fingers crossed x
PS. Doesn't seem to work. Will include thumbnails.
First inline post, fingers crossed x
PS. Doesn't seem to work. Will include thumbnails.
Attachments
Last edited:
MikeL
Go Fish
More nice ones Ned. (Waiting for telenous too)
Luckily, the Summarit isn't too expensive, so hopefully this thread won't be ruined. But then again, it is a Leica product, so.........
Looking forward to more Summarit images!
Luckily, the Summarit isn't too expensive, so hopefully this thread won't be ruined. But then again, it is a Leica product, so.........
Looking forward to more Summarit images!
foto_fool
Well-known
MikeL said:Luckily, the Summarit isn't too expensive, so hopefully this thread won't be ruined. But then again, it is a Leica product, so.........
Looking forward to more Summarit images!
Second that, Mike!
But, you know... I really think that there's nothing special about this lens. I could graft a Holga lens onto a Nikon D3 and get images comparable to what I've seen here.
I like the images this lens renders wide-open - good sharpness and contrast compared to contemporaneous Sonnar designs, less "clinical" than the current Summilux.
I just got one back from DAG and have shot one roll with it, after testing it on the R-D1. Will post something when I complete my scans (if this thread is not killed first).
- John
photobizzz
Speak of the Devil
I cant wait to try mine, it is in the mail as we speak and I will be home in 13 days. I picked up the 41mm lens hood with cap from cameraquest. Does anyone have the chrome version of this style hood? I was just wondering if it is the silver of a CV lens or actually chrome as the photos on cameraquest.com only show the black version. I also have a 50 Nokton waiting for me at home, it will be interesting to see the diff between two 50/1.5 lenses from different eras.
Ororaro
Well-known
Ah, glad to see this old thread revived. I love this lens. Smoooth with character. I understand my sample is super clean and CLA'd by DAG so it performs as it was performing 50 years ago. Some people say it's a bad lens, but I suspect those people have sample in bad shape, wihch is apparently normal for this lens (fog and dust particles inside).
I recommend this lens to anyone and have it CLA'd asap. The results are unique.
I recommend this lens to anyone and have it CLA'd asap. The results are unique.
gertf
Established
some great shots here, i'd encourage you all to post more 
Ronald M
Veteran
Real Summarit cap is real chrome. There was no paint in the Leitz factory except for painting black bodies.
Mean Panda
Established
Ned, Nice picture again. I had the lens before. But I found it was very soft wide open. And I traded it for the summicron rigid. My personal experience told me to stay away from the summarit(just my humble opinion). But I admire that people used it to captured some great moment. By the way, the summicron rigid is very sharp, and it is so far my favourite for B/W.
Stu W
Well-known
Does anyone make an e41 to e39 adapter? I have an entire set of Summarit filters, including the IR, but they really are impractical to use. Keep them as collectibles. Stu
kevin m
Veteran
Luckily, the Summarit isn't too expensive, so hopefully this thread won't be ruined. But then again, it is a Leica product, so........
Ah, by "ruined" I suppose you mean you'll be exposed to opinions contrary to your own, or be compelled to use logic or provide photographic proof for your claims, rather than just blowing internet air kisses to those who already share your views? That sort of "ruined?"
The Summarit seems nice enough, and it's a good value. I guess the low price keeps the new-agey, mystical terms used to describe the Noctilux out of the discussion, so that's a plus.
I really think that there's nothing special about this lens. I could graft a Holga lens onto a Nikon D3 and get images comparable to what I've seen here.
Sarcasm can be funny. When it's done properly. This, however, brings to mind the Voltaire quote: "All styles are good, except the boring."
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
kevin m said:Ah, by "ruined" I suppose you mean you'll be exposed to opinions contrary to your own, or be compelled to use logic or provide photographic proof for your claims, rather than just blowing internet air kisses to those who already share your views? That sort of "ruined?"![]()
The Summarit seems nice enough, and it's a good value. I guess the low price keeps the new-agey, mystical terms used to describe the Noctilux out of the discussion, so that's a plus.![]()
Sarcasm can be funny. When it's done properly. This, however, brings to mind the Voltaire quote: "All styles are good, except the boring."![]()
your really just determined to run amuck at every chance possible arent you?
peterm1
Veteran
Heard recently: "A camera and lens are nothing more than mechanical aperatus. their mind belongs to the photographer. A photographer should learn to use his cameras and lenses like an artist uses his brushes."
From a documentary about Frank Hurly an Australian photographer of the first half of the 20th century.
I was reminded of it in this debate about the Summarit. I look on this kind of lens as one that is like a special brush. You use it when you want a specific effect in your pictures but it may not be one you use every day.
From a documentary about Frank Hurly an Australian photographer of the first half of the 20th century.
I was reminded of it in this debate about the Summarit. I look on this kind of lens as one that is like a special brush. You use it when you want a specific effect in your pictures but it may not be one you use every day.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.