gdi
Veteran
I know they are cheap - but is the performance any good and worth a few bucks? I believe they are East German for Exacta? I am considering a 135 and 90.
Thanks
Thanks
VictorM.
Well-known
I have had a 90mm/2.8 for screw-mount Leica since 1969. The optics are good but the quality, especially the focusing mount, is poor. Mine is worn out and no longer usable. A 90mm Elmar from the '50's is a better choice. This was done with the Travenar 90/2.8 on an M2: http://www.flickr.com/photos/vgmayes/321817439/in/set-72157594329980962/
gdi
Veteran
Thanks Victor - I did find some more info and I think I'll pass on Schacht's!
nodyad
Member
cmedin
Well-known
nodyad: what body is that?
DeeCee3
Established
I've had two Schachts in bygone years and both performed adequately. Both happened to be f3.5 35mm Travegons (or maybe Travenars...?? it's been a long time now), one in LTM and one for Exakta. I used the LTM with an adaptor on my M2 and I still have the Exakta although it hasn't been used in 15 years.
A. Schacht of Ulm was a well-respected German optical firm; camera lenses were not their main production item. I remember reading that Schacht is now a part of a large German R&D corporation.
They were not stellar performers but I surely wouldn't pass one by.
dc3
A. Schacht of Ulm was a well-respected German optical firm; camera lenses were not their main production item. I remember reading that Schacht is now a part of a large German R&D corporation.
They were not stellar performers but I surely wouldn't pass one by.
dc3
nodyad
Member
cmedin said:nodyad: what body is that?
Only a few days ago I learned from Peter Dechert's Shutterbug article on "The 1950 Canons" that it is one of the Skinner Canon IVs from 1950. See the recent new thread under Dechert's Canon column here.
Last edited:
DeeCee3
Established
GDI, Schacht was a West German firm, not East German. Ulm, the city where they were located, also boasts the tallest steeple in Germany. It can be seen for miles as you approach the city.
dc3
dc3
gdi
Veteran
Darn, I may try them after all...
ferider
Veteran
If you are looking for good and cheap 90/135 lenses for your M3,
consider Nikkor 85/2, Nikkor 135/3.5 and Canon 135/3.5. The two
135 lenses can be had for peanuts and are as good as anything
out there ...
Best,
Roland.
consider Nikkor 85/2, Nikkor 135/3.5 and Canon 135/3.5. The two
135 lenses can be had for peanuts and are as good as anything
out there ...
Best,
Roland.
raid
Dad Photographer
nodyad said:Only a few days ago I learned from Peter Dechert's Shutterbug article on "The 1950 Canons" that it is one of the Skinner Canon IVs from 1950. See the recent new thread under Dechert's Canon column here.
I have a feeling that this comment was meant for another thread. :bang:
raid
Dad Photographer
ferider said:If you are looking for good and cheap 90/135 lenses for your M3,
consider Nikkor 85/2, Nikkor 135/3.5 and Canon 135/3.5. The two
135 lenses can be had for peanuts and are as good as anything
out there ...
Best,
Roland.
Hello Roland,
Sometimes, it is the fun of trying new things out that make us set aside the obvious. The Nikkor 135mm is razor sharp, by the way. Another cheap option is a Steinheil lens.
VictorM.
Well-known
I didn't intend to discourage anyone from trying a Travenar. The main problem with mine was the soft aluminum used for the mechanical parts and the machining of the focus cam. my example has a flaw in the cam that shows up at about 3 metres and causes inaccurate focusing from about there to just under two meters. The lens worked well for me for 25+ years, including several long motorcycle/camping trips. Like Raid says, trying different stuff can be interesting.
gdi
Veteran
Well I did buy them - and even talked myself into buying his Leicaflex SLR with 28 Elmarit (why did that I'll never know, but I'll find someone who needs it and pass it along!)
The 90mm Travenar is pretty good optically, the 135 Back focuses about 6-8" (anyone know how to adjust it?)http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=649670#post649670
The 90mm Travenar is pretty good optically, the 135 Back focuses about 6-8" (anyone know how to adjust it?)http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=649670#post649670
Last edited:
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.