mfogiel
Veteran
Before going on my little holiday to the south of France, I have asked for some advice on broadening my choice of film, restricted hitherto mainly to XP2. I am still waiting for the traditional silver film to come back from a specialized lab, but I've already scanned my AGFA SCALA rolls, and here I am ready to share the experience with you. So far, most of the photos I've uploaded from this trip on flickr, are shot on this film, so for a shortcut you can start looking here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/59177039@N00/1404112270/in/set-72157602063137880/
and make yourself an idea, however I also have some comments to make.
To begin with, since I've been used to shooting XP2 at ISO 200, shooting Scala at the same speed was comfortable. I used the red and orange filters at times, so the speed was welcome, and, BTW, I have come to regard F4.0 as an aperture at which my best lenses are already at the top, so whenever I can I shoot at this aperture (or wider) and this contributes to the final sharpness of the photo further, because often my shutter speed indicates 1/2000, and the detail afterwards is impressive. Just to show what I mean, here's a shot made at f 4.0 with the (evil) FM3A and Planar 85/1.4, handheld at 1/2000:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1429647252&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
The sharpness of the film is good, but not spectacular, and what has been a slight negative respect to XP2, is the grain, which in certain cases shows a bit, I believe it would be better to shoot Scala at ISO 100, especially for those with a hybrid workflow in mind - already at the "regular" ISO 200, the shots are not very contrasty to begin with, but this is actually helpful in scanning (will touch on scanning further down) - here's an example of visible grain:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1429005007&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
admittedly, the sky has been darkened substantially in PS, so in normal circumstances it would not be as visible.
However, in certain subjects, some grain is not a problem, especially if it comes together with really impressive tonality, especially in the middle to deep shadows range. This is probably my best shot from the trip so far, and when I saw it on the screen I really enjoyed it:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1404241134&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
This incredible middle and lower grays are quite addictive to the extent that you start looking for exposing this characteristic, sometimes at the expense of the highlight range:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1429761932&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
I don't actually want to say, that the dynamic range is short, on the contrary, while not as broad as XP2, it lets you easily play the high contrast scenes like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1404114240&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
Where the limitations show up more, is in the shadows, where sometimes it is harder to recover some detail - in this shot I increased the contrast of the faces, at the expense of some pick up in grain, to make the expression show better:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1426881963&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
All in all, I find this to be a fantastic film, especially for situations rich in subtle tonal passages, like here:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1429883364&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
or, incredibly, in case of controlled light (here a flash bounced off the ceiling) portraits like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1434532050&size=l
Now, the practical side of handling Scala has been interesting - this is a silver based film, but a slide, so I started scanning it with ( Nikon CS 9000) the ICE turned on and with Vuescan set to "slide film" option - obviously the results were disastrous, because I got artifacts all over the place caused by ICE, and the images came out posterized, because I was scanning in 16 bit but through 3 channels (less than 6 bit per channel).
After some searching and tweaking, I turned the ICE off, set the input to "B&W negative" , 16 bit, and the film profile to "XP2". At this point I got very good scans (albeit inverted), and only in shots with a light source in, some slight highlight clipping was visible. Then I inverted the images again in PS and made the usual adjustments. The spotting is necessary, but not very heavy, as the good thing about starting with a positive image, is that the dust turns out as dark rather than white spots, and is far less visible.
To sum up, I find this film to be really great, and I think the incredible shadow tonalities are its winning card ( apart from the convenience of not having to make contact prints). I will shoot next rolls at ISO 100 and develop accordingly ( I use a pro lab in Milan, the last which processes Scala here: "Chrome" in Pzza Aspromonte), and hopefully come back with some nice results. If any of you gets to know of a source of this film around, please do one of the two things:
- buy as much as you can for yourself, or...
- send me a HU message, so I will take care of cleaning these supplies for as much as my freezer permits 🙂
http://www.flickr.com/photos/59177039@N00/1404112270/in/set-72157602063137880/
and make yourself an idea, however I also have some comments to make.
To begin with, since I've been used to shooting XP2 at ISO 200, shooting Scala at the same speed was comfortable. I used the red and orange filters at times, so the speed was welcome, and, BTW, I have come to regard F4.0 as an aperture at which my best lenses are already at the top, so whenever I can I shoot at this aperture (or wider) and this contributes to the final sharpness of the photo further, because often my shutter speed indicates 1/2000, and the detail afterwards is impressive. Just to show what I mean, here's a shot made at f 4.0 with the (evil) FM3A and Planar 85/1.4, handheld at 1/2000:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1429647252&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
The sharpness of the film is good, but not spectacular, and what has been a slight negative respect to XP2, is the grain, which in certain cases shows a bit, I believe it would be better to shoot Scala at ISO 100, especially for those with a hybrid workflow in mind - already at the "regular" ISO 200, the shots are not very contrasty to begin with, but this is actually helpful in scanning (will touch on scanning further down) - here's an example of visible grain:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1429005007&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
admittedly, the sky has been darkened substantially in PS, so in normal circumstances it would not be as visible.
However, in certain subjects, some grain is not a problem, especially if it comes together with really impressive tonality, especially in the middle to deep shadows range. This is probably my best shot from the trip so far, and when I saw it on the screen I really enjoyed it:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1404241134&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
This incredible middle and lower grays are quite addictive to the extent that you start looking for exposing this characteristic, sometimes at the expense of the highlight range:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1429761932&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
I don't actually want to say, that the dynamic range is short, on the contrary, while not as broad as XP2, it lets you easily play the high contrast scenes like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1404114240&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
Where the limitations show up more, is in the shadows, where sometimes it is harder to recover some detail - in this shot I increased the contrast of the faces, at the expense of some pick up in grain, to make the expression show better:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1426881963&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
All in all, I find this to be a fantastic film, especially for situations rich in subtle tonal passages, like here:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1429883364&context=set-72157602063137880&size=l
or, incredibly, in case of controlled light (here a flash bounced off the ceiling) portraits like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1434532050&size=l
Now, the practical side of handling Scala has been interesting - this is a silver based film, but a slide, so I started scanning it with ( Nikon CS 9000) the ICE turned on and with Vuescan set to "slide film" option - obviously the results were disastrous, because I got artifacts all over the place caused by ICE, and the images came out posterized, because I was scanning in 16 bit but through 3 channels (less than 6 bit per channel).
After some searching and tweaking, I turned the ICE off, set the input to "B&W negative" , 16 bit, and the film profile to "XP2". At this point I got very good scans (albeit inverted), and only in shots with a light source in, some slight highlight clipping was visible. Then I inverted the images again in PS and made the usual adjustments. The spotting is necessary, but not very heavy, as the good thing about starting with a positive image, is that the dust turns out as dark rather than white spots, and is far less visible.
To sum up, I find this film to be really great, and I think the incredible shadow tonalities are its winning card ( apart from the convenience of not having to make contact prints). I will shoot next rolls at ISO 100 and develop accordingly ( I use a pro lab in Milan, the last which processes Scala here: "Chrome" in Pzza Aspromonte), and hopefully come back with some nice results. If any of you gets to know of a source of this film around, please do one of the two things:
- buy as much as you can for yourself, or...
- send me a HU message, so I will take care of cleaning these supplies for as much as my freezer permits 🙂