HuubL
hunter-gatherer
Saw this one at the German peebay: http://cgi.ebay.de/Leitz-Leica-M3-M...ryZ26844QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
The seller says it's a 1962 model and the late number supports that, but the screws in the top plate tell me it's an early model? What say you??
The seller says it's a 1962 model and the late number supports that, but the screws in the top plate tell me it's an early model? What say you??
colyn
ישו משיח
I suspect that an early crate was put into a late shell with top plate possibly during an overhaul. If that is true then the crate s/n will not match the top plate s/n.
I have heard of this happening..
I have heard of this happening..
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Or just a 'ringer', made from one camera in good mechanical order and another that was cosmetically better but (for example) with water damage -- that is far from unknown too. Though I am not enough of a rivet-counter to know what screws can be used where.colyn said:I suspect that an early crate was put into a late shell with top plate possibly during an overhaul. If that is true then the crate s/n will not match the top plate s/n.
I have heard of this happening..
Cheers,
R.
Bill Blackwell
Leica M Shooter
Everything about the camera appears late to me except the screws in the topcover. And it appears to have the original wax seal (or a very good facsimile).
There are a few possibilities that come to mind:
1. It was a replacement old-style top engraved by Leica;
2. The screw holes were added because the user/technician preferred them.
There are a few possibilities that come to mind:
1. It was a replacement old-style top engraved by Leica;
2. The screw holes were added because the user/technician preferred them.
Last edited:
Bill Blackwell
Leica M Shooter
Or (3) the topcover was replaced and someone has an engraving machine (for the serial number) approximating Leica's.
The ad also says it was recently CLA'd.
The ad also says it was recently CLA'd.
Share: