topoxforddoc
Established
HP5 and XTOL 1:1
Charlie
Charlie
Chris101
summicronia
I used trix developed in hc110b for decades. A year or so ago, I began to use delta 400, with dilution h and a long interval agitation. I prefer delta's grain, contrast and detail. I still shoot trix for sentimental reasons. With rare exceptions, I only shoot these two films.
dacaccia
M246&X100V&GFX 50R
TriX - and Agfa APX (unlisted - but I still get it here) in Rodinal 1:25
Cheers,
dacaccia
Cheers,
dacaccia
Honus
carpe diem
I like them all, but Tri-X remains my favorite.
kingjon
Established
Finally getting the hang of HP5+. Started w/ D-76 1:1, switched to HC110 dil. e or h and haven't looked back.
Jon
Jon
Michiel
Established
I use Fomapan 400. Not because it's particularly good, but it's jolly cheap..
sfb_dot_com
Well-known
I went for Neopan because I just processed a roll or two and the results were great, but that may be more down to the polarising filter I was using, and the light. It scans well on the Epson V750 too.
PHOTOEIL
Established
HP5+ in Pyrocat-HD, was APX 400 in Rodinal for years and years....
hp
in xtol
in xtol
PATB
Established
Tri-X in D-76 1:1.
like2fiddle
Curious
I've tried several on the list and shot mostly HP5, but Tri-X has become my standard film.
efreddi
Newbie
TriX, no doubt!!!
Elia
Elia
chris000
Landscaper
like2fiddle said:I've tried several on the list and shot mostly HP5, but Tri-X has become my standard film.
I'm thinking about going the other way. I love Tri-X but I use FP4 as a slower film and I'm beginning to feel that Ilford are showing greater interest in the future of film generally and B+W film in particular. So I feel I should support them until I'm too old and frail to carry a camera or too senile to care!
magnus67
Member
I've mostly used Ilford Delta 400, but recently I shot a couple of rolls of HP5+ and liked the result very much. It was beyond expectation in low light situations (pushed to EI ca 1000-1250).
Graham Line
Well-known
crawdiddy said:I've noticed that Fuji Neopan seems to have a following. Can someone tell me what you like about it, other than 50 cents cheaper than HP5 and a buck cheaper than Tri-X?
Neopan 400 gives you an honest 400 speed in most standard developers and is a bit more contrasty than comparable films from other mfr's. All depends what you're trying to achieve.
Graham Line
Well-known
thomasw_ said:Overwhelmingly 75% of RFF users favour Ilford's HP5+ or Kodak's TriX. I wonder if it is based primarily on aesthetics?
Probably because so many of us are old folks resistant to change. Or people going for the '40s and '50s Life-Paris Match look.
thomasw_ said:My favourite 400 speed film is Ilford's Delta 400 developed in DDX 1+4; ... the Delta grain is exquisite and creamy.
Same here. Used to shoot a lot of 120 B&W, and Delta 400 in DD-X looks like the results from a Rolleiflex, but in 35mm. Also like the way Delta leaves the shadows open.
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
I have always insisted that the world is divided, not in religion,race, color etc, but in film preference! Tri X and HP5 running neck to neck with 38+% each!
Well, at least we are civilized and dont shoot (well, we do, but not with bullets), maim or kill because of preference. I have used most films made over the decades, but if I have choice it is Tri X. You can push or pull it more than salfwater taffy at a beach resort, You can develop it in virtually anything and anywhere. If there ever was an international phrase that works it is "Tri X @400, D76 1:1 for 10-11 minutes"
So, it is not the most fine grained of the 400, nor does it have the longest tonal range, but it always will give you a printable negative, even under adverse condition.
Have fun, go to Flickr and hit the tag "Tri X" or "Tri X/5063" and sit back and enjoy the show,
Well, at least we are civilized and dont shoot (well, we do, but not with bullets), maim or kill because of preference. I have used most films made over the decades, but if I have choice it is Tri X. You can push or pull it more than salfwater taffy at a beach resort, You can develop it in virtually anything and anywhere. If there ever was an international phrase that works it is "Tri X @400, D76 1:1 for 10-11 minutes"
So, it is not the most fine grained of the 400, nor does it have the longest tonal range, but it always will give you a printable negative, even under adverse condition.
Have fun, go to Flickr and hit the tag "Tri X" or "Tri X/5063" and sit back and enjoy the show,
ghostganz
Member
I switched from Tri-X to HP5 after I read that the film base in HP5 attracts less dust, so it would be easier to scan. It seems to be true, but 35mm b+w is a pain to scan either way.
gregg
Well-known
I flip-flop (so would make a great politician) but my current favorite is Fuji Neopan 400 in D-76 (1:1). It was also my favorite combination before spending the last year messing around with film/dev combos.
Also like Arista.EDU Ultra 400/Forte in Diafine or D:76 (1:1).
Also like Arista.EDU Ultra 400/Forte in Diafine or D:76 (1:1).
Russ
Well-known
Fuji Neopan 400. It's awesome!
Russ
Russ
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.