Oliver H
Member
hi there,
i like to buy a (d)slr camera - mainly to use it with a fisheye lens.
i thought about the panasonic l1 & the olympus fisheye - has anyone experiences with this combination?
an alternative would be a used leica r & the elmarit fisheye (and then scanning the negs ...)
any recommendations?
thanks and regards,
oliver
-------------------
www.photographias.org
i like to buy a (d)slr camera - mainly to use it with a fisheye lens.
i thought about the panasonic l1 & the olympus fisheye - has anyone experiences with this combination?
an alternative would be a used leica r & the elmarit fisheye (and then scanning the negs ...)
any recommendations?
thanks and regards,
oliver
-------------------
www.photographias.org
titrisol
Bottom Feeder
Nikon and the Nikkor Fisheye is also good.
I have a takumar Fisheye, have not tried it in a DSLR, but works fine in all Kmount cameras
You may also want to try a Zenit fish eye, those are quite cheap and have heard good reviews from them.
I have a takumar Fisheye, have not tried it in a DSLR, but works fine in all Kmount cameras
You may also want to try a Zenit fish eye, those are quite cheap and have heard good reviews from them.
Kim Coxon
Moderator
Both the K and A series Pentax fisheyes are nice lenses. The 10-17 Fisheye zoom is also quite a useful lens. It has all the characteristics of a fisheye at the wide end but is also usable as a more normal wideangle at the long end. There are several threads elsewhere on this forum with regards to the Pentax dSLRs.
Kim
Kim
warren1960
Warren
I would not bother with a fisheye unless it was on a full frame DSLR. My OM fisheye is quite disappointing on a Canon D400.
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
Welcome, following Kim's cue on the Pentax, this should give you some insight:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/K17FE-FOV/
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/K17FE-FOV/
Kim Coxon
Moderator
I would agree with a full frame fisheye on a cropped sensor. However a "digital" fisheye on a dSLR does work quite well, hence my suggestion for the 10-17 on the Pentax.
Kim
Kim
warren1960 said:I would not bother with a fisheye unless it was on a full frame DSLR. My OM fisheye is quite disappointing on a Canon D400.
LocoDuck
Wind, Click, Capture
For a DSLR... some 4/3rds body (new E3?) and 7-14... Most beautiful lens I have ever worked with, or seen.
Oliver H
Member
... thanks for all of your feedbacks - a decision will we made soon.
>>locoduck: i also thought about the e-3. but this camera includes to many features / gimmicks for me.
regards,
oliver
----------------
www.photographias.org
>>locoduck: i also thought about the e-3. but this camera includes to many features / gimmicks for me.
regards,
oliver
----------------
www.photographias.org
Sam R
Established
Fish eye
Fish eye
I have a D80 & 10.5mm fish..also have an old Pentax MX with 17mm fish eye. I love fish eyes. The Pentax and 17mm work great just process and scan. You should be able to find that combo for less than $500. The Nikkor cost me 599 for lens alone...I like the 17mm better
Fish eye
Oliver H said:hi there,
i like to buy a (d)slr camera - mainly to use it with a fisheye lens.
i thought about the panasonic l1 & the olympus fisheye - has anyone experiences with this combination?
an alternative would be a used leica r & the elmarit fisheye (and then scanning the negs ...)
any recommendations?
thanks and regards,
oliver
-------------------
www.photographias.org
I have a D80 & 10.5mm fish..also have an old Pentax MX with 17mm fish eye. I love fish eyes. The Pentax and 17mm work great just process and scan. You should be able to find that combo for less than $500. The Nikkor cost me 599 for lens alone...I like the 17mm better
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.