Telewatt said:my new lens for the IIf.....🙂
View attachment 55545
View attachment 55546
f2,8 1/250 sec.
View attachment 55547
f2,0 1/60 sec.
regards,
Jan
David Murphy said:Mint ones are hard to find. It's a beauty for sure. I think the Summarit is underated. One sample I owned recently, which had some glass issues, still produced strikingly sharp images (I'll post one later today here).
Luddite Frank said:I'm quietly jealous...
The Summarit ( or a coated Xenon) is on my wish-list...
Of course, if I find a nice 1.5 Canon or 1.4 Nikkor, I won't refuse either one.
Nice lens, nice pics !
Thanks for sharing !
Luddite Frank
Hacker said:Canon f1.5 at the Leicashop. Perfect glass I believe.
https://www.leicashop.com/main.php?leicaopen=0&kat=23&kat2=11&orderno=14464_3
Telewatt said:Thanks for the feetback....🙂
Today I found this!....😱..Polarisationfilter for the Summarit!
View attachment 55652
regards,
Jan
Ronald M said:They tend to be in very bad state, then people complain of low contrast etc.
Mine is better than any `lux I ever tried except the current ASPH version.
It has better edge definition than the 1959, less distortion than the 40 year run one which I never found one that was not sharp until 8.0.
Yes, underrated IF you FIND A CLEAN one and put a decent shade on it.
raid said:Would it make sense to have the front element coated?
It could result in a more contrasty 50/1.5 lens.
Telewatt said:Thanks for the feetback....🙂
Today I found this!....😱..Polarisationfilter for the Summarit!
View attachment 55652
regards,
Jan