Graybeard
Longtime IIIf User
I've been using Barnack Leicas for quite a long time now, but these have all been post WWII models, IIIc's, IIIf's, and IIIg's.
Recently I was handling a IIIa in pretty good (user) cosmetic condition and I noticed some difference ibetween the internals of the IIIa I was examining and the later models with which I am familiar.
Specifically, when looking into the lens mount opening, one of the shutter curtain rolls was visible. In a IIIc, the curtain rolls are covered by a metal baffle. Similarly, when the baseplate was removed, some of the shutter mechanism was visible. In a IIIc and later, the mechanism is covered by the plate which carries instructions for the dimensions of the film leader.
The IIIa I was examining resembled the Russian Leica II clones whch I've seen in the lacking cover plates found in the IIIc.
So, my question is, did the Leica IIIa originally have these cover plates/baffles? (meaning that they had been removed in the IIIa I handled) or were the cover plates an addition to the IIIc and later models?
TIA
Recently I was handling a IIIa in pretty good (user) cosmetic condition and I noticed some difference ibetween the internals of the IIIa I was examining and the later models with which I am familiar.
Specifically, when looking into the lens mount opening, one of the shutter curtain rolls was visible. In a IIIc, the curtain rolls are covered by a metal baffle. Similarly, when the baseplate was removed, some of the shutter mechanism was visible. In a IIIc and later, the mechanism is covered by the plate which carries instructions for the dimensions of the film leader.
The IIIa I was examining resembled the Russian Leica II clones whch I've seen in the lacking cover plates found in the IIIc.
So, my question is, did the Leica IIIa originally have these cover plates/baffles? (meaning that they had been removed in the IIIa I handled) or were the cover plates an addition to the IIIc and later models?
TIA