popobsd
Member
I did use F2.8 and F4 alot..
I have voted for f2.8, as this is where approximately I use it more often, but this is actually a bit imprecise: I shoot the f1.5 version mostly at f2.0, and the f2.8 version mostly in the f2.8-f5.6 range, this lens out of the factory (f 2.8 optimized) delivers it's best between f2.8 and f4.0
Well if you don't use it wide open what's the point of a Sonnar? At f/16 you can get decent results out of any 50mm lens.
The Ikon viewfinder is the focus shift killer
Please explain this. I have an Ikon. Are you saying that the issues being discussed about 'optimization' and focus shift don't apply when using the Ikon? Because of the wider RF baseline? Are all of the people who are talking about limiting aperture choice based on which aperture the lens is optimized for... are they all shooting it with a Leica or Hexar?
I probably would have bought the C-Sonnar instead of the Summicron i have now, except for the focus shift stuff. I'm not really interested in fudging my way around with it, as i use too many different kinds of equipment, and i'm sure i'd forget to NOT focus on the eye when i wanted the eye in focus at 1.5 or whatever....
By the way... my first M-mount lens was an original Zeiss 50mm 1.5 Sonnar, and with an M7, i never recalled having any focus shift problems.....