which 28mm lens is the best?

N

noah b

Established
Local time
7:39 AM
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
191
Hello all! I'm currently trying to find a 28mm lens for my M3 and am having a hard time figuring out which ones are good and fit the camera. I'd like to find a canon but anything would do really. Any help is appreciated.
 
The CV 28mm Ultron f1.8 is honestly one of my favorites. I used it exclusively over the past six months and have made plenty of great images with it.



2903150943_9eb10be07e_o.jpg

2851770832_01f5e688f1_o.jpg

2903151515_98a470383a_o.jpg

2903151309_062051fdd8_o.jpg

2908230515_c0ecbc26fa_o.jpg

2909076246_65d1518d8e_o.jpg

2908230403_73c7cb47d2_o.jpg

2908229931_4f042b9b5d_o.jpg

2916531520_5d37425e4f_o.jpg

2903995880_682a9ca7be_o.jpg

2850938751_5d15d2da73_o.jpg

2903995806_65d589fdcb_o.jpg

2903150821_8ea83f9427_o.jpg

2903995400_921f3731c9_o.jpg
 
I think just about any of the 28mm are very, very good. Depends on what you want and if price is a factor. I like my CV 28/1.9 but I like my 28 Elmarit even more.
 
If you can find one, the Canon Serenar 28/3.5 in LTM is an exquisite and tiny chrome beauty that shoots wonderfully. I always wished Canon had made lenses in S/C mount.

William
 
I assume you will use an auxiliary VF on the M3? As such, JBF's suggestion of the 'biggie' lens makes a ton of sense: the 28/1,9 CV is a sweet performer and it is a deal now, and its size won't be a big deal with an auxiliary finder.
 
I would simply state that it's likely a bit of a challenge to find a truly lousy M-mount 28, so I wouldn't get awfully obsessive here.

Having said this, I wouldn't trade my 28 f/2.8 M-Hexanon for anything.

attachment.php

Near Herald Square, NYC, February 2002. One of the first images I made with my first Hexar RF.


- Barrett
 

Attachments

  • 34st.jpg
    34st.jpg
    84.9 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
I use a CV 28/3.5, and I share the general appreciation of it - I think it has to be one of the best lenses I've ever used. (So good that, now it is discontinued, I often think about getting another one while there is still some stock left).
 
I would agree that there are so many good 28mm choices for the Leicas. I have currently have the CV 28mm 3.5 but had the Ultron 1.9 and found it to be an exceptional lens. I recently traveled in Europe carrying a 28mm Elmarit ASPH, 21mm Elmarit pre-asph and Nokton 40mm f1.4.

I prefer the 28 Elmarit handling-wise to just about any other lens that I have used and that is important to me given that the image quality is so good. Here are links to some examples with the Elmarit and one with the Ultron wide-open, and highlighting the ability to isolate subject. There are more pics to see as well from the links.

http://www.pbase.com/image/94994811
http://www.pbase.com/bitonal/image/94535948
http://www.pbase.com/bitonal/image/103183144
 
There are lots of good 28mm lenses. Since you asked what the best is, I think if this were a poll with the summicron in it, it would be leading.
 
antistatic said:
The new CV Ultron 2.0 also does a good job.

David
Click to expand...

Sorry, but I tried two copies of the new Ultron and was less than impressed with both of them:

M-Hexanon 28/2.8 @2.8 - lower left hand corner:
attachment.php


Ultron 28/2.0 @2.8, lower left hand corner:
attachment.php


Cheers,
Uwe
 

Attachments

  • l1000545_M_Hex.jpg
    l1000545_M_Hex.jpg
    46.7 KB · Views: 0
  • l1000547_Ultron.jpg
    l1000547_Ultron.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 0
Hi Uwe,

Ultron 28/2.0 @2.8, lower left hand corner:
Click to expand...
That looks like camera shake to me - you can clearly see the characteristic "double image" effect in the characters on the computer screen.

Best regards,
 
Well, I will admit being disappointed with the new voigt 28/2. It's no match for the pre-asph elmarit at 2.8+. I haven't seen any solid reviews of it yet, but I suspect it may fall the way of the 35 nokton classic we just saw.
 
oscroft said:
Hi Uwe,


That looks like camera shake to me - you can clearly see the characteristic "double image" effect in the characters on the computer screen.

Best regards,
Click to expand...

Alan,
Yes, the corners to look like camera shake.
Here are crops from the centre showing no double images.
The Ultron picture was the best out of three. I couldn't get it any sharper.

I got really annoyed about the Ultron and refrained from trying a third copy.
Maybe I was just unlucky, but my M-Hex wide open ran circles around both Ultron copies stopped down to 2.8.

M-Hex 28/2.8 @ 2.8 centre crop:
attachment.php


Ultron 28/2.0 @2.8 centre crop:
attachment.php


Cheers,
Uwe
 

Attachments

  • l1000545_M_Hex_Centre.jpg
    l1000545_M_Hex_Centre.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 0
  • l1000547_Ultron_Centre.jpg
    l1000547_Ultron_Centre.jpg
    32.9 KB · Views: 0
kipkeston said:
Well, I will admit being disappointed with the new voigt 28/2. It's no match for the pre-asph elmarit at 2.8+. I haven't seen any solid reviews of it yet, but I suspect it may fall the way of the 35 nokton classic we just saw.
Click to expand...

Either I'm very lucky or not very discerning :rolleyes:

All I know is that it does a much better job than my Rokkor 2.8 (my only other 28mm reference point. My copy was way too soft and took "glow" to a disturbing level).
 
I have 2 28mm lenses: the Elmarit 28/2.8 ASPH and the Biogon 28/2.8 ZM, and I got the Biogon only recently, because the Elmarit shots lack something with respect to the Zeiss ZM lenses which I prefer. However, now I will have some time to test these lenses side by side, and will repost the results FWIW. Here are a couple of shots made on a 400 ISO film:
Elmarit:
2593805724_3cdf19a3c2_b.jpg


Biogon:
2918222762_5598cf2964_b.jpg


The Elmarit shot had some sharpening applied, while the Biogon shot had not - it has more "bite" , or microcontrast, which I like, especially in these wider lenses.
 
Yes, the corners to look like camera shake.
Here are crops from the centre showing no double images.
The Ultron picture was the best out of three. I couldn't get it any sharper
Click to expand...
How interesting, and very curious. I wonder if there's any possibility of ghosting of any sort - did you have a filter on? (I know it's only a remote possibility - the "double images" look too bright to be ghosts). But (in my non-expert thoughts) that double-imaging really looks like it would need a pretty bad fault to produce.

I got really annoyed about the Ultron and refrained from trying a third copy.
Maybe I was just unlucky, but my M-Hex wide open ran circles around both Ultron copies stopped down to 2.8
Click to expand...
I guess it's possible you had two bad ones, but very unlucky. Though if it really is such a badly flawed design, I wouldn't have expected Tom A to be so impressed with his example. I wonder if it's just really bad quality control?

Anyway, thanks for the example - it's enough to make me rethink my half-plan to get one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom