Canon LTM Canon 28/2.8 fragile?

Canon M39 M39 screw mount bodies/lenses

itf

itchy trigger finger
Local time
6:50 AM
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
313
I'm interested in this lens after seeing one today and realizing its very compact, but I remember reading somewhere (photo.net I'm pretty sure) that its fragile. Is it? It looks pretty similar to the 28/3.5.
 
The 28/2.8 has the nice chrome on brass build of the older Serenars. My example feels dense and solid. It's the later black on aluminum 35/2 and 50/1.4 that feel jiggly.
 
I read the p.net thread. Alex Shishin definitely got this one wrong. Seriously, the build on the old Canon 28/2.8 would put some modern Leica lenses to shame.

It's a good lens for the money, if you can still find one in the $200 to $250 range.
 
Mine's like a little rock too. Sweet lens. I was looking for a LTM Nikkor 28mm for my III but this one fell into my lap, and I've been pretty happy with it.
 
I have the f3.5 version. It and the Summaron match up perfectly with the CV28/35 minifinder.
 
I have a 35/2.8 and I dropped it while in the little leather case it was in and thought it would be ruinned but it is still rock solid. I got a 50/1.4 Canon off of Ebay it it feels losey but takes wonderful pictures. The older lenses are very well built. I a newer CV 35/2.8 and hope that I never drop it since its aluminum.
Joe
 
As the consensus has said, well built lens. The later 35/2 is a beautiful lens, and certainly not poorly built. Those that have them, generally love them.

I really don't know of a poorly built Canon RF lens. And the early brass mounts were very well machined. It was a quality house, period.

Harry
 
Back
Top Bottom