kshapero
South Florida Man
Film RF M Mount or a digital RF M mount, both full frame. Both look exactly the same. Which would you choose?
Rafael
Mandlerian
I've got this one Alex, what is "which one exists?" 
dazedgonebye
Veteran
Good question.
back alley
IMAGES
same question
different words
over & over
horse beaten
different words
over & over
horse beaten
sepiareverb
genius and moron
FIlm. I like the process and end results better. But I don't really care what anyone else wants to use.
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
None.
I'm all in for medium format rangefinders
I'm all in for medium format rangefinders
BillBingham2
Registered User
Neither. I want a M4/3s digital range finder body with a set of primes with manual focus and control through two dials (one ss, the other fstop).
But if I had to pick, give me a film as vignetting is not an issue.
B2 (;->
But if I had to pick, give me a film as vignetting is not an issue.
B2 (;->
gb hill
Veteran
Film for me. I have more freedom to shoot at higher ISO's than you can with a digital. I can't name a digital camera that can give me what Delta 3200 can. I also have the option to shoot infrared. I still have several rolls of HIE. Plus a film version will be around when the digital version is obsolete or inoperatable. Mostly...I just like film.
back alley
IMAGES
i want it all!
Bob Michaels
nobody special
The only thing that matters is the emotional response that the print creates in the viewer's mind.
All the steps that precede that are insignificant.
35mm? MF? digital? b&w vs. color? Who cares how you got there, it is only where you end up that counts.
All the steps that precede that are insignificant.
35mm? MF? digital? b&w vs. color? Who cares how you got there, it is only where you end up that counts.
back alley
IMAGES
i think film is so unauthentic.
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
I've got this one Alex, what is "which one exists?"
Oooh, sorry Ralph. The question is "What is a question that's been asked ad nauseum on the photography internets?"
back alley
IMAGES
sorry guys, rough week at work and just being a bit of a smart ass tonight.
having the sony a300 has turned a screw in my thinking. with it, i am having fun taking photos again. the camera is not nearly as nice as the zi and the lenses are not nearly as beautiful as the zm lenses and for some some strange reason i don't care and things seem more enjoyable.
having the sony a300 has turned a screw in my thinking. with it, i am having fun taking photos again. the camera is not nearly as nice as the zi and the lenses are not nearly as beautiful as the zm lenses and for some some strange reason i don't care and things seem more enjoyable.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Rafael
Mandlerian
DAMN! I should have known that one. I even studied for this category.
back alley
IMAGES
So we can conclude that digital is for those who no longer care.
i don't know if it's digital or just the ugly, clunky, plastic gear!
charjohncarter
Veteran
Decent question, my answer is I have many full film (FF) RFs, so I would buy a FF digital RF. But from what I know now about DSLRs, and I didn't have digital cameras (or FF film camera), I would buy both.
Sam N
Well-known
If this imaginary digital FF RF has no (or very minimal... no more than a ZI with film for example) vignetting, performance, or reliability problems it would be an easy choice.
thomasw_
Well-known
So we can conclude that digital is for those who no longer care.
Now, Bob, this witty inference made me chuckle ;P