marduk
Well-known
The original ad is now gone but here is the pic: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1085990#post1085990
adrianzg
Established
hello from a fellow singaporean!!
first, congrats on ur purchase, it's a really good price for such a nice camera!
the dual range is a really really good lens. it's my favourite since getting it. problem is, i've gone through 3 to find a good one. usual problems are hazing and scratches on the rear element's coating due to improper cleaning.
i'd suggest a version 4 35mm summicron if you can find one. for tele i'd go for a 90mm tele-elmarit, the thin one, for stealth.
check out this strap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaT_qwnQ38
it's really easy to diy and it works really really well!
trev2401
Long Live Film!!!
Zoomp, you might want to continue looking around the internet, especially here on the forums or even the bay. To me, 850$ for even a minty DR is just a tad expensive. If i remember correctly, there were a few 50 crons with built in hoods going for 700-800$ here on RF some time ago. But then again, if you want retro, the dr or rigid is good. (but not for 850$usd)
btw, nuts on clubsnap tend to bump up the prices like siao. (i kena once) As such, do your homework before shopping yeah?
have fun!
btw, nuts on clubsnap tend to bump up the prices like siao. (i kena once) As such, do your homework before shopping yeah?
have fun!
ZoomP
Well-known
Hey there!!! Thanks for the advice.
notturtle
Well-known
if you are not in need of a fast lens I strongly recommend the CV 35 pancake 2. performs very well indeed and is tiny (as well as half the price of the ZM 35 2.8). The ZM likely has a slight edge, but not one (according to my use the the pancake II and the biogon f2) that will matter much. I agree with Tom A that a 35 is a very good place to start with a 35mm RF. IMHO, it is a FAR better place to start than 50mm inless you intend most of your shots to be of people. The 35 can do it all: street, landscape, cityscape etc. great jack of all trades. After that, something wider and one longer would suit, like 25 + 50.
Rogrund
Antti Sivén
Like Tom and notturtle said. Get a 35. I'd say one of the CV's, either the 35/2.5 or the 35/1.4.
Al Kaplan
Veteran
A reminder about the close-up "advantage" of the D.R. 'cron. It DOES NOT EXIST if you base it on area covered A 90mm lens at its closest focusing distance covers exactly the same area as the D.R. Summicron with the eyes in place. A 90 doesn't require you to stop and put the eyes in place, and you can buy a black 90.
adrianzg
Established
it does as u'll only need one DR cron instead of a 50 and a 90.
a very valid point nonetheless..ZoomP
Well-known
Bought a CV 50 f2.5 instead cos' it's cheap. Also gotten a VC straps but noticed it doesn't sit well with the zhou casing.
Here's some latest pics. I love the chrome/black contrast!!!
Here's some latest pics. I love the chrome/black contrast!!!
Jason Sprenger
Well-known
Speaking of contrast, you'll have it in the pictures from the CV 50/2.5.
For a small, inexpensive lens, I find that it's built very well and handles nicely.
I use one in my small kit and like it with color film.
Enjoy!
For a small, inexpensive lens, I find that it's built very well and handles nicely.
I use one in my small kit and like it with color film.
Enjoy!
JustPlainBill
Established
Hi,
Congratulations on acquiring your M2. It looks really nice. Also looks like the origianal M2/M3 flash terminals have been exchanged for M4 flash terminals, which are more practical. Once upon a time (about 1964) I bought a 35mm f2.5 Nikkor in Leica screwmount for my Leica IIf. I liked it so well that when I bought my M4, I bought screw to bayonet adapters for my lenses. That little 35mm lens is far and away my most used lens over the years. I can get closer to my subjects using it than a 50 mm lens. The 35mm f2.5 Nikkor in LTM may be the same lens as is often used on the Nikonos underwater cameras - in a different mount, of course. Good success with your M2.
JustPlainBill
Congratulations on acquiring your M2. It looks really nice. Also looks like the origianal M2/M3 flash terminals have been exchanged for M4 flash terminals, which are more practical. Once upon a time (about 1964) I bought a 35mm f2.5 Nikkor in Leica screwmount for my Leica IIf. I liked it so well that when I bought my M4, I bought screw to bayonet adapters for my lenses. That little 35mm lens is far and away my most used lens over the years. I can get closer to my subjects using it than a 50 mm lens. The 35mm f2.5 Nikkor in LTM may be the same lens as is often used on the Nikonos underwater cameras - in a different mount, of course. Good success with your M2.
JustPlainBill
ZoomP
Well-known
Just swapped the 2.5 for a VC 1.5 for faster f stops.
Here's some new pics. The quality for the 2.5 is indeed very high.
Here's some new pics. The quality for the 2.5 is indeed very high.
