eleskin
Well-known
I have been reading the results of some tests online, and it seems the M8 at 100% magnification, produces sharper photographs than the M9. This may be the price of having IR filter technology integrated with the sensor chip.
I find this very interesting, and it may not make the M8 a forgotten outdated camera. Indeed, the original decision to have no IR filter may still have benefits.
Those of you who have used the M8, and now have an M9, what can you tell us when comparing your files to the older M8?
How do your larger prints (17"x22") look with the M9 vs. the M8. Those of us contemplating buying the M9 are very interested in these questons, and $7k is very serious money, especially in these times.
I find this very interesting, and it may not make the M8 a forgotten outdated camera. Indeed, the original decision to have no IR filter may still have benefits.
Those of you who have used the M8, and now have an M9, what can you tell us when comparing your files to the older M8?
How do your larger prints (17"x22") look with the M9 vs. the M8. Those of us contemplating buying the M9 are very interested in these questons, and $7k is very serious money, especially in these times.