Roger Hicks
Veteran
i dont think you can include baby linhofs Roger 😉
folders, they can be fun, they are! that might be the only thing needed to get someone taking a picture, the fun and thought of actually composing a picture (instead of snap ,snap)....and considering what goes into it...sometimes slower is better, although i dont believe the majority of cameras you mention are notably any quicker to use, (prob the polaroid is), particularly for critical focusing the folder with the coupled rangefinder is precise and quicker. a decent folder is rigid, of course it cant be compared to the brick strength of the alpa (heck they only have one standard!) but they are rigid enough for the job,
your camera choices are system cameras as well (i too use system camera's ), perhaps from reading your post the only thing i can think where a reasonable difference lies that may 'not' be considered a 'serious' camera is that a folder has a fixed lens...for serious photography we need changeable lenses? if so that doesn't mean it has to be the only camera you own but a very usefull style of camera in certain situations
are the pictures produced from folders not serious pictures? are they of less worth than what comes from an MP or M8.2 ?
cheers
Andrew
Dear Andrew,
Fair enough, of course. But while I freely agree folders can be fun, I just can't see them as favourite.
Cheers,
R.