scorpius73
Well-known
These don't show up anywhere. How does the older Nikon 3.5cm f2.5 stack up against the newer Voigtlander 35mm f2.5?
batterytypehah!
Lord of the Dings
I recently got the Nikkor 3.5cm/2.5 in LTM and liked my first roll a lot, except the Leica has a light leak. Some sample photos here http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1281426#post1281426 and in post #9 here http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87189. Sorry for the rough scans.
The LTM version has a conventional external aperture ring. I don't think I could live with the recessed ring on the Nikon/Contax version. That speaks for the CV.
The LTM version has a conventional external aperture ring. I don't think I could live with the recessed ring on the Nikon/Contax version. That speaks for the CV.
VinceC
Veteran
I've never seen a side-by-side and never used the CV version. However, by most accounts the CV is comparable with the other modern CV lenses. It would be difficult for meaningful improvement of the Nikkor's sharpness, even in the corners. However, the Nikkor as a 1950s lens would probably have less contrast.
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
I have both the CV 35f2.5 and the Nikkor 35f2.5 in Nikon mount. The Nikkors are as good as the 1 and 2nd generation Summicrons. Lower contrast than the CV lenses - but perfect for bl/w. The CV is outstanding - about as good medium speed 35 you will ever need.
The aperture ring on the Nikkors are bit fiddly - but you soon get the hang of it. I tend to shoot the Nikkors with slower film and pucnh up the contrast with the developer. The CV is just one that goes along for regular stuff.
Oh, the Nikkor 25f4 is not unsharp by any means. The center is really sharp, edges at f4 go a bit soft - but it has massive edge fall-off. The CV 28f3.5 is the same formula as the LTM version and I rank that as one of the best 28's ever made. Sharp, with a very distinct 'signature" in black/white.
The aperture ring on the Nikkors are bit fiddly - but you soon get the hang of it. I tend to shoot the Nikkors with slower film and pucnh up the contrast with the developer. The CV is just one that goes along for regular stuff.
Oh, the Nikkor 25f4 is not unsharp by any means. The center is really sharp, edges at f4 go a bit soft - but it has massive edge fall-off. The CV 28f3.5 is the same formula as the LTM version and I rank that as one of the best 28's ever made. Sharp, with a very distinct 'signature" in black/white.
They're both great lenses! Get both
My experience with the CV 35/2.5 is that it's super sharp right into the corners, high contrast even at f/2.5, and smooth bokeh. Great if you want a modern look!
In comparison, the Nikkor 35/2.5 has softer corners wide open but sharpens up by f5.6-8, has lower contrast, and you can get an interesting swirly bokeh effect in the right circumstances. It's got character! If you can find one of the final batch of 1,200 lenses, it will have an aperture ring similar to the W-Nikkor 35/1.8 which makes changing the aperture a little easier than on the earlier versions.
Sometimes you can find deals. This one sold for 41,550 yen last Sunday on the YJ auctions. And on the very same night, this regular type late black 35/2.5 sold for 46,000 yen, or 4450 yen *more* than the much rarer lens.
scorpius73
Well-known
Thanks for the info guys. I would love to have a 35mm for my Nikon RF. I have noticed that I almost never use my portrait lenses but I'm always using my 28, 35 and 50mm lenses for my other cameras. So, I will keep my eyes open for a CV or Nikon 35mm f2.5. The f1.8 is out of range though.
Last edited:
Ain't that the truth. I would have grabbed the new 35/2.5 for 41,000 yen if I didn't already have one, but 46,000 yen was way high for the regular black version.