Maiku
Maiku
Hi,
Last week, on a whim, I bought a Fed 5b with a Industar 55mm f2.8 L/D. The results, I got were outstanding. I do not understand why the FSU cameras and lenses are so maligned. Did I get lucky with my lens or are my samples representative of what Industars and Jupiters offer in terms of quality?
Let me see what your FSU lenses produce. Give us a sample.... Pretty Please!
Maiku
Last week, on a whim, I bought a Fed 5b with a Industar 55mm f2.8 L/D. The results, I got were outstanding. I do not understand why the FSU cameras and lenses are so maligned. Did I get lucky with my lens or are my samples representative of what Industars and Jupiters offer in terms of quality?
Let me see what your FSU lenses produce. Give us a sample.... Pretty Please!
Maiku
Attachments
paulfish4570
Veteran
The sepia-looking tone on some of the shots was the "gift" of some dirty processing at Walgreens. Bw400cn and xp2 film. Bessa R.
Industar-50, bw400cn:
Jupiter-8, bw400cn:
xp2:
Industar-50, bw400cn:



Jupiter-8, bw400cn:

xp2:


Last edited:
mnmleung
Established
Thanks to gb hill for showing me how to post a photo:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mnmleung/4543335678/
Industar-61 L/D 53mm at maximum aperture f/2.8 using Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400, 1/30 sec, taken with a Leica III. Scanned from print from BigW. Ming
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mnmleung/4543335678/


Industar-61 L/D 53mm at maximum aperture f/2.8 using Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400, 1/30 sec, taken with a Leica III. Scanned from print from BigW. Ming
Last edited:
Menopta 53/1.8 on the Nikon RF.
Industar 61L/D on the Nikon RF.
Helios-103 on the Nikon RF.
paulfish4570
Veteran
Nice, mnm. That could go on the family thread, too ...
And ---
The Collapsible Version of the Industar 61L/D. (okay, I hacked it...)
The Collapsible Version of the Industar 61L/D. (okay, I hacked it...)
gb hill
Veteran
To post a photo from flickr all you have to do is:I have not figured out how to post a photo yet. So here is a link
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mnmleung/4543335678/
Industar-61 L/D 53mm at maximum aperture f/2.8 using Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400, 1/30 sec, taken with a Leica III. Scanned from print from BigW. Ming
1 click on photo from your stream you wish to post
2 click the 'all sizes' on top of your photo
3 pick which size you want (I use med) large is too big!
4 under photo you will see 2. the photos URL. right click that & left click copy.
5 come to RFF & click on advanced reply to post.
6 See the color icon where the sun & green mtns are? left click that. Be sure when the line with the http pops up clear that out (or http will be in twice & will not work)
7 right click & left click paste. Click ok! Your image will appear. Then hit sumit reply...easy!
Last edited:
julio1fer
Well-known
Fed 5b and Industar 61 L/D

gb hill
Veteran
Industar 61 on a Fed 5 BW400CN

gb hill
Veteran
J-12 35/2.8 Kodak BW400CN

Last edited:
1953 J-3, on the Leica M8.
gb hill
Veteran
Here is a Industar 50/3.5 rigid on a Bessa R. I like this lens!

reala_fan
Well-known
Jupiter 8, wide open on Bessa R3a, Fuji 1600 CN :
.


.
yek
Regiestered new user
The collapsible I-22, on my Fed-2.


gerbilthemistake
Well-known

First test roll for the Zorki 1 and Industar 22 I just received.
David Murphy
Veteran
I've also found the 61 L/D to be a sharp lens with good contrast. The problem with it is that about half the examples I've seen have mechanical issues (irregular focus mechanisms or loose parts).
The J-12's I've seen (and I've owned a few) seem to be a little better built. My experience with the J12 indicates it does a mediocre job with color film - the color images lack a certain luster (I presume this is a function of the coatings). The Kiev versions I've seen have been better made mechanically than the LTM version. It is certainly a good lens for the money, and pleasing to use (I love the way the iris setting ring works).
If one can find defect-free examples both make acceptable lenses to get started with in my view.
The J-12's I've seen (and I've owned a few) seem to be a little better built. My experience with the J12 indicates it does a mediocre job with color film - the color images lack a certain luster (I presume this is a function of the coatings). The Kiev versions I've seen have been better made mechanically than the LTM version. It is certainly a good lens for the money, and pleasing to use (I love the way the iris setting ring works).
If one can find defect-free examples both make acceptable lenses to get started with in my view.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.