haempe
Well-known
Today I made some shots around the house of my father with my zorki and he comes to me and say: "Your camera looks like the Leica of your grandfather" - "I dont know he had a Leica. And where it is?" - "In the basement."
After a while of searching in the basement we found finaly this:
A Leica III (1933) with Hektor 2,5/50 and Elmar 4/90.
The glass is not in the best condition, but 1/30 - 1/500 sounds good and the body looks nice. Ok, the long times dosn´t work, but after 50 years in a box in the basement ... not bad. And for me - really a bargain.
I will develop the test-roll tomorrow, hope...
After a while of searching in the basement we found finaly this:

A Leica III (1933) with Hektor 2,5/50 and Elmar 4/90.
The glass is not in the best condition, but 1/30 - 1/500 sounds good and the body looks nice. Ok, the long times dosn´t work, but after 50 years in a box in the basement ... not bad. And for me - really a bargain.
I will develop the test-roll tomorrow, hope...

chris7521
Well-known
nice score!
haempe
Well-known
nice score!
yes, some kind of jackpot...
Well worth getting restored, especially as it belonged to your Grandfather. The Hektor is an uncommon lens.
haempe
Well-known
No question. It´s not only a Camera, it´s family-history.Well worth getting restored, especially as it belonged to your Grandfather.
I think it has fungus. Not shure, if it is restorable.The Hektor is an uncommon lens.
parsec1
parsec1
Have it restored if you can and use it....Thats what their for.
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
Cool Factor = Grandpa's camera
Congrats on the basement find...
Congrats on the basement find...
beyond
Jason Beyond
Sentimental value. Its a keeper. Now..I think I should go and checkout my grandparents place. Hahaha.
ChrisN
Striving
A wonderful discovery, especially with the connection to your grandfather. I have a pair of Zeiss binoculars that belonged to my maternal grandfather, who died before I was born. That and a photo of him at my mother's wedding are my only physical links to him.
Melvin
Flim Forever!
Sweet find! Hopefully the lens can be cleaned.
ktran
Established
I don't think the Hektor is a coated lens, so you might luck out in that if it is fungus, there won't be any coating to be damaged. A lot of times, the haze is just the old grease breaking down separating into its oil and wax components, so you might be in luck (ie: it could be very fixable!)
Roger Hicks
Veteran
What a wonderful story! Lucky you indeed!
Optical Instruments (Balham) in Croydon outside London can almost certainly restore the lens at a reasonable price, and for a lens that rare, it's worth it.
http://www.optil.co.uk/
It looks like a small-pin baseplate, which suggests to me that it was probably a factory conversion from a Standard.
Cheers,
R.
Optical Instruments (Balham) in Croydon outside London can almost certainly restore the lens at a reasonable price, and for a lens that rare, it's worth it.
http://www.optil.co.uk/
It looks like a small-pin baseplate, which suggests to me that it was probably a factory conversion from a Standard.
Cheers,
R.
Last edited:
fotomeow
name under my name
these are the things we usually only dream about ....... Similarly, but not quite the same, last week I found that my uncle has my 97 year old Gpa's 1960 Rolleiflex TLR, and he said he would send it to me. At least he said he would, but ya'all dont know my uncle ........
robbeiflex
Well-known
This is the best kind of classic camera to have - one whose history is known and linked to yours, congratulations!
I have a similar story behind my Rolleiflex. On a recent trip home I got started talking photography with my mother's long time partner. I remembered his Nikon SLR from a visit a couple of years ago and asked him if he was still shooting film. He has gone mostly digital and although the Nikon had a roll in it, he lamented the fact that he didn't use the Rolleiflex any more. Knowing that I was using a cheap Lomo Lubitel for medium format he offered me the Rolleiflex me on the spot. He just said, if you get it serviced, can find film for it, and will use it then its yours!
I second the other posts urging you to get it CLA'd, you won't regret it!
I have a similar story behind my Rolleiflex. On a recent trip home I got started talking photography with my mother's long time partner. I remembered his Nikon SLR from a visit a couple of years ago and asked him if he was still shooting film. He has gone mostly digital and although the Nikon had a roll in it, he lamented the fact that he didn't use the Rolleiflex any more. Knowing that I was using a cheap Lomo Lubitel for medium format he offered me the Rolleiflex me on the spot. He just said, if you get it serviced, can find film for it, and will use it then its yours!
I second the other posts urging you to get it CLA'd, you won't regret it!
haempe
Well-known
Thanks all for your kind words.
The other point is interesting. The story my father told about the Camera dosn´t fit with the serial number.
The oral-family-history tells, he buyed the leica in 1928 before his travel to the olympic games in Amsterdam. But the serial number says, the cam is from 1933. Maybe he give the cam for an upgrade, but I always thought the serial number would be remain in this case.
Maybe help more pics to clearify?
Thanks...
Similar story, my grandfather was KIA in 1944 when my father was 2 years.A wonderful discovery, especially with the connection to your grandfather. I have a pair of Zeiss binoculars that belonged to my maternal grandfather, who died before I was born. That and a photo of him at my mother's wedding are my only physical links to him.
Thanks for the link. I will keep it in mind.What a wonderful story! Lucky you indeed!
Optical Instruments (Balham) in Croydon outside London can almost certainly restore the lens at a reasonable price, and for a lens that rare, it's worth it.
http://www.optil.co.uk/
It looks like a small-pin baseplate, which suggests to me that it was probably a factory conversion from a Standard.
Cheers,
R.
The other point is interesting. The story my father told about the Camera dosn´t fit with the serial number.
The oral-family-history tells, he buyed the leica in 1928 before his travel to the olympic games in Amsterdam. But the serial number says, the cam is from 1933. Maybe he give the cam for an upgrade, but I always thought the serial number would be remain in this case.
Maybe help more pics to clearify?



Thanks...
wolves3012
Veteran
Lucky find, that's definitely one to have restored and never sell! Not in the same league but I have my father's Kiev 4 that I rarely use but won't part with, it's a sentimental link.
Last edited:
raid
Dad Photographer
Congratulations on such a great find. The lens and the camera are excellent pieces to enjoy and treasure. Being linked to your family makes this an even better find.
jarski
Veteran
grandpa, Leica. grandson, Zorki
(just joking
)
congratulations, indeed a lucky find! none of my grandparents ever owned any camera, but least I got a pocket watch
if it needs a CLA, Will van Manen is good candidate here in Europe.
congratulations, indeed a lucky find! none of my grandparents ever owned any camera, but least I got a pocket watch
if it needs a CLA, Will van Manen is good candidate here in Europe.
Mr_Flibble
In Tabulas Argenteas Refero
Wonderful discovery Haempe,
Beautiful camera too. Definitely worth a CLA.
Beautiful camera too. Definitely worth a CLA.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Yes, normally the serial number would stay the same - but the small pin and the oral history argue for a conversion. A mystery. What does the pressure plate look like? Very early Leicas have a hole in the pressure plate, with a screw behind the hole, for setting up the fixed lens, but I've forgotten when this feature was dropped.
Cheers,
R.
Cheers,
R.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.