martin s
Well-known
I fail to understand how an adult could not handle the 75mm Summilux. If it is too heavy, then I have to wonder how such a person could survive.
Altough this probably is the funniest thing I've read all day - I had the lens for some time, and using it for a whole day on a Leica M6 without accessories (grip, winder) is nearly impossible. It didn't balance at all. On the M8 it was better though.
martin
raid
Dad Photographer
Whoa...BRILLIANT Shot Raid.....![]()
Thank you, Helen.
I used Kodak 100UC and the lens may have been set at 1.4-2.0. Getting the lens to focus hand held can be a challenge.
My wife does not like this image, by the way. She feels that the light is creating shadowing that isnot flattering for Lina's face. I like the image. I love my daughter.
yanidel
Well-known
Who needs pants Pockets
I'll strap it to my Body.....
had the 35 1.2 nokton and the size & weight did not Bother me.
Both lenses share the same weight but Different Dimensions.
It is now my ONLY BIG lens I own.....its worth every bit in weight...
Cheers- H
I guess it also depends how much you walk with your kit. Spent 7 hours today walking in the streets of Paris. Putting my 60mm Hexanon on the M9 balances well but is already heavy (400 grs) after a while, especially if you carry your camera in your hand.
I guess the ones that do not complain about the weight drive to take pictures
Last edited:
ampguy
Veteran
I did an all day event with M8 and 75/lux, towards the end of the day, I'd put it down for coffee breaks.
There are no photos during coffee breaks.
There are no photos during coffee breaks.
MikeL
Go Fish
The lens weighs 560 grams. When I can't walk around all day with an extra 560 grams, I'm punching out.
Other lenses weigh less, but the images from it keep it in my bag.
Other lenses weigh less, but the images from it keep it in my bag.
FPjohn
Well-known
"Horses for courses". M/75 Lux is big and heavy. Light and elegant is a IIIb and 35mm Elmar.
yours
FPJ
yours
FPJ
helen.HH
To Light & Love ...
The lens weighs 560 grams. When I can't walk around all day with an extra 560 grams, I'm punching out.
Other lenses weigh less, but the images from it keep it in my bag.
Oh hello Mike
I read that the 1st version / 1980-82 is 490 grams
thats the ONE I'm getting (1980) .... w-detachable Hood
is the latter versions 2 or 3 weigh in at 560g ?
Last edited:
raid
Dad Photographer
I may have the second version, Helen. It is manageable to carry such a lens the entire day. I may take it with me on my next Cairo trip. The opportunities are worth the risk of theft.
Last edited:
MikeL
Go Fish
Oh hello Mike
I read that the 1st version / 1980-82 is 490 grams
thats the ONE I'm getting (1980) .... w-detachable Hood
is the latter versions 2 or 3 weigh in at 560g ?
Hi Helen,
That sounds right, the first one is lighter. I rarely extend the hood on mine since it is so flare resistant, so I don't think you'll need the hood much. For me, it balances much better than the other heavy weight, the noctilux.
I knew I had to try one when I read it was Walter Mandler's favorite lens, and I'm glad I did. Not everyone likes using the focal length, but it sure can create beautiful images in the right hands.
raid
Dad Photographer
I have had the lens for about 3 months, but these are my first results with it.
I can see myself traveling with this lens with the main purpose of taking portraits.
Maybe the Lux with a 35mm Summicron.
I can see myself traveling with this lens with the main purpose of taking portraits.
Maybe the Lux with a 35mm Summicron.
naruto
GASitis.. finally cured?
These pics tempt me... *sigh*
Beautiful pics Mike.
Beautiful pics Mike.
raid
Dad Photographer
My Lux has a built-in hood, so it is a Type 2 Lux.
The going rate for a very clean Lux is about $2500 used or more. Am I right?
The going rate for a very clean Lux is about $2500 used or more. Am I right?
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
There are times when I really miss the 75 lux. But I just wasn't using it enough. And the size did bother me.
Obviously, the lenses I put on my D700 dwarf the 75 lux, but I expect then again, the camera itself is much bigger.
Some of it, for me at least, is a balance issue. The 75 lux just seems to dominate the camera its mounted upon. Still, I won't be surprised if I end up with another one some day.
Obviously, the lenses I put on my D700 dwarf the 75 lux, but I expect then again, the camera itself is much bigger.
Some of it, for me at least, is a balance issue. The 75 lux just seems to dominate the camera its mounted upon. Still, I won't be surprised if I end up with another one some day.
fbf
Well-known
depends on the serial# and canadian/german
I wouldn't pay 2.5k$ for it
I wouldn't pay 2.5k$ for it
raid
Dad Photographer
There are times when I really miss the 75 lux. But I just wasn't using it enough. And the size did bother me.
Obviously, the lenses I put on my D700 dwarf the 75 lux, but I expect then again, the camera itself is much bigger.
Some of it, for me at least, is a balance issue. The 75 lux just seems to dominate the camera its mounted upon. Still, I won't be surprised if I end up with another one some day.
So for a Version 2 Lux $2500 is too high for you.
What is the going rate then?
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
So for a Version 2 Lux $2500 is too high for you.
What is the going rate then?
That sounds like it is in the right ballpark - depending on condition. Though it has been at least a year since I was paying attention the 75 lux market.
raid
Dad Photographer
That sounds like it is in the right ballpark - depending on condition. Though it has been at least a year since I was paying attention the 75 lux market.
I then got a great deal from someone. Thanks.
Last edited:
Calzone
Gear Whore #1
That sounds right, the first one is lighter. quote]
Perhaps I am mistaken, but my understanding is that the second version is slightly lighter than the first version, and this would explain the premium in price between the first and second versions.
I find that a TA Rapidwinder, TA Rapidgrip and a Leica 1.40X magnifier are ergonomic improvements that bring out the full capabilities of this lens. Still smaller and lighter than a Nikon F3 with a motor drive. Also for me, a heavy camera is a steady camera for hand held.
Helen, if you want to handle a 75 Lux V.2, come to the next NYC Meet-Up this Sunday at Lorelie's. I'll bring my pimped out M6 with Rapidwinder, Rapidgrip and 1.40X magnifier along with my 75 lUX V.2.
The slow focus is not an issue if you practice-practice-practice. I have an image that was a "shot in the dark" that was taken in a bar wide open at 1/15th second. Focus was about 12 feet away, I was seated at a table, and I used the chair and table to form a tripod with my elbows. One guy at our table had just enough light for a shot. In the background were all these Christmas lights to make multi-point light sources to add to the high contrast lighting.
As far as pricing: My understanding is that the same low coma glass used to make a Noctilux was used to make the 75 Lux, and the performance I have seen kinda verifys it. Dealer pricing on E-Bay for collectors is a lot more than 2.5K for 2d versions. About a $500.00 discount for a version one. A Noctilux is a heavier lens BTW, and in comparing prices to a Noctilux 75 Luxes are cheap.
Cal
ampguy
Veteran
It's the German one that is lighter
It's the German one that is lighter
Of the two later ones with built in hoods, the last one made in Germany is a bit lighter. Some call it the V3, but it is the same optics as v2. Still much heavier than a V1.
It's the German one that is lighter
Of the two later ones with built in hoods, the last one made in Germany is a bit lighter. Some call it the V3, but it is the same optics as v2. Still much heavier than a V1.
That sounds right, the first one is lighter. quote]
Perhaps I am mistaken, but my understanding is that the second version is slightly lighter than the first version, and this would explain the premium in price between the first and second versions.
I find that a TA Rapidwinder, TA Rapidgrip and a Leica 1.40X magnifier are ergonomic improvements that bring out the full capabilities of this lens. Still smaller and lighter than a Nikon F3 with a motor drive. Also for me, a heavy camera is a steady camera for hand held.
Helen, if you want to handle a 75 Lux V.2, come to the next NYC Meet-Up this Sunday at Lorelie's. I'll bring my pimped out M6 with Rapidwinder, Rapidgrip and 1.40X magnifier along with my 75 lUX V.2.
The slow focus is not an issue if you practice-practice-practice. I have an image that was a "shot in the dark" that was taken in a bar wide open at 1/15th second. Focus was about 12 feet away, I was seated at a table, and I used the chair and table to form a tripod with my elbows. One guy at our table had just enough light for a shot. In the background were all these Christmas lights to make multi-point light sources to add to the high contrast lighting.
As far as pricing: My understanding is that the same low coma glass used to make a Noctilux was used to make the 75 Lux, and the performance I have seen kinda verifys it. Dealer pricing on E-Bay for collectors is a lot more than 2.5K for 2d versions. About a $500.00 discount for a version one. A Noctilux is a heavier lens BTW, and in comparing prices to a Noctilux 75 Luxes are cheap.
Cal
Calzone
Gear Whore #1
Of the two later ones with built in hoods, the last one made in Germany is a bit lighter. Some call it the V3, but it is the same optics as v2. Still much heavier than a V1.
Thanks. Mine is the German version (V.3). Bonus.
Cal
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.