75mm f/1.4 Summilux Photos

Jeez my head is spinning re: the WEIGHT ISSUE

so then Version 1 is the LIGHTEST
thats my Understanding
the other TWO are 560 grams
the first is 490

I HOPE its the Lighter One I'm getting.....;)

Calzone: YES will go to the Next RFF / NYC Extravaganza
 
helenhill said:
Jeez my head is spinning re: the WEIGHT ISSUE

so then Version 1 is the LIGHTEST
thats my Understanding
the other TWO are 560 grams
the first is 490

I HOPE its the Lighter One I'm getting.....;)

Calzone: YES will go to the Next RFF / NYC Extravaganza
Click to expand...
490 grams with the detachable hood included ? :D
 
tbarker13 said:
Obviously, the lenses I put on my D700 dwarf the 75 lux, but I expect then again, the camera itself is much bigger.
Click to expand...

A relative uses the 24-70 f2.8 on his D700 for weddings, and that thing weighs in at over 900 grams, nearly twice the 75mm summilux. But he also has the battery grip and flash on it, and that seems to help with the overall sense of balance.
 
ferider said:
Don't worry about the weight, Helen. A grip might help if you think it's too large.
Click to expand...

Helen, I can also bring a ML-Grip to the Meet-Up. Just remember to bring your M-body. A grip makes a huge differance. THe ML-Grip is almost weightless BTW.

This would be my second choice if I didn't have a TA Rapidwinder and Rapidgrip.

Cal
 
TRES COOOL 'set up' Roland !!!

is the M3 the Best way to go visually speaking for the 75 lux
My M6ttl is .58 ....ouch.... I know wrong Direction
but I have now moved on from my 21 & 35

strictly a 50mm Gal who might become addicted to the 75mm as well

Can Dag do something for my .58 dilemma
or is an M3 beckoning / .91
 
My M3 shows 50 and 90 permanently, Raid.

Will be difficult with .58, Helen. You could use a magnifier, but it's not the same.
Problem with the M3 is that by default, the 75 brings up only 50mm lines.

Easiest is to get a .85 M[67P]. Sorry,

Roland.
 
raid said:
I may have to get an ML grip then.
This lens is a "must" lens.
Click to expand...

I had the opportunity to mount my 75 Lux on Damaso's M6 TTL with Rapidwinder at a NYC Meet-Up. The balance of the M-body is restored and the nose heavyness created by the 75 Lux's length goes away, even without a Rapidgrip the added 5/8 inch to the width of the M-body makes a signifigant contribution to comfort.

I would first recomend a Rapidwinder before a grip, but the ML grip is perfered over the M-Grip (which I also happen to own). Be aware that some early Rapidwinders do not have the necessary threaded hole to mount a Rapidgrip BTW.

I agree with you that a 75 Lux is a must have/keeper. Paired with a 35 Cron and you have a wonderful 2 lens long/short kit. I found that the focusing tab on my Cron falls more naturally, and the dagger/spike spreads my hands apart to provide a more secure attachment without compromising my ability to focus, when I wrap my pinky, or at times two fingers.

Although counterintuitive, I find carrying and using the Lux with Rapidwinder and Rapidgrip less fatiging despite the added weight when I carry this rig all day walks in NYC. The 75 Lux also feels more ergonimic on M8's and M9's with their thicker bodies. Perhaps this coresponds to the price drive upwards since the M9 release.

Cal
 
ferider said:
My M3 shows 50 and 90 permanently, Raid.

Will be difficult with .58, Helen. You could use a magnifier, but it's not the same.
Problem with the M3 is that by default, the 75 brings up only 50mm lines.

Easiest is to get a .85 M[67P]. Sorry,

Roland.
Click to expand...

Now I get it; the 75mm lens shows up the 50mm lines in the M3! I did not know this fact. What does it show in the M6? What about the Hexar RF?
I used both cameras without even thinking about the shown frame. I got the images though. :D

My M6 has the 0.85 magnification.
 
Calzone said:
I had the opportunity to mount my 75 Lux on Damaso's M6 TTL with Rapidwinder at a NYC Meet-Up. The balance of the M-body is restored and the nose heavyness created by the 75 Lux's length goes away, even without a Rapidgrip the added 5/8 inch to the width of the M-body makes a signifigant contribution to comfort.

I would first recomend a Rapidwinder before a grip, but the ML grip is perfered over the M-Grip (which I also happen to own). Be aware that some early Rapidwinders do not have the necessary threaded hole to mount a Rapidgrip BTW.

I agree with you that a 75 Lux is a must have/keeper. Paired with a 35 Cron and you have a wonderful 2 lens long/short kit. I found that the focusing tab on my Cron falls more naturally, and the dagger/spike spreads my hands apart to provide a more secure attachment without compromising my ability to focus, when I wrap my pinky, or at times two fingers.

Although counterintuitive, I find carrying and using the Lux with Rapidwinder and Rapidgrip less fatiging despite the added weight when I carry this rig all day walks in NYC. The 75 Lux also feels more ergonimic on M8's and M9's with their thicker bodies. Perhaps this coresponds to the price drive upwards since the M9 release.

Cal
Click to expand...

Thanks for the tip, Cal.
I am glad that I already have paid for this lens.
It is a keeper.
I am thinking of a 35-75 combo for trips.
 
ferider said:
My M3 shows 50 and 90 permanently, Raid.

Will be difficult with .58, Helen. You could use a magnifier, but it's not the same.
Problem with the M3 is that by default, the 75 brings up only 50mm lines.

Easiest is to get a .85 M[67P]. Sorry,

Roland.
Click to expand...

Damaso's M6 TTL was a 0.85 TTL and the Lux really liked his camera.

0.91 on a M3 is also wonderful, but no framelines.

At one point I was considering a M5 because of the bigger body; and, even though it also did not provide 75 frames, I was still considering the M5 because I observed the border I would have to mentally impose and subtract from the 50 frames matched the length and width of my rangefinder patch respectfully. Although not ideal, I thought I could do it.

With my 0.72 M6 the 1.40X Leica Magnifier my viewfinder is effectively 1.00.

Cal
 
Raid

Raid

The 75 corners come up with 50 framelines since the M4P. I can't remember what my Hexar RF did with the 75.

You can easily use 50 framelines with the 75, just keep in mind to give some space around the subject in the 50 lines.

a .85 VF or magnifier is not really needed unless you do < 1m wide open shots a lot. A properly adjusted 75/1.4 works well, and focuses easily even on Epson RD1s.

raid said:
Now I get it; the 75mm lens shows up the 50mm lines in the M3! I did not know this fact. What does it show in the M6? What about the Hexar RF?
I used both cameras without even thinking about the shown frame. I got the images though. :D

My M6 has the 0.85 magnification.
Click to expand...
 
raid said:
Now I get it; the 75mm lens shows up the 50mm lines in the M3! I did not know this fact. What does it show in the M6? What about the Hexar RF?
I used both cameras without even thinking about the shown frame. I got the images though. :D

My M6 has the 0.85 magnification.
Click to expand...

Your 0.85 is a great rig for 50's and the 75 Lux. If you get the opportunity to try a Leica 1.25 X magnifier-try it. I wish I wasn't so digitally inept because I post these Macro like photos I took of a rat I killed in a slaptrap in my backyard. Did you know rats have buck teeth? Title of the shot is "New York Still Life." The close focus combined with the magnification is a fun challenge.

The 75 frames within the 50 framelines sometimes causes me to take some inadvertant close shots, but frquently the confusion makes for some great shots with tight framing.

Cal
 
.85x with 75lux is good but not great, especially if you use it at minimum focus distance a lot. It takes time to master the focus and DOF.
I have tried using .85x with 1.25x magnifier. It works pretty nicely.
 
fbf said:
.85x with 75lux is good but not great, especially if you use it at minimum focus distance a lot. It takes time to master the focus and DOF.
I have tried using .85x with 1.25x magnifier. It works pretty nicely.
Click to expand...

I need good light to be able to see well enough to focus such a lens wide open and at minimum distance. A 1.25X or 1.4X is needed for me.
 
ampguy said:
The 75 corners come up with 50 framelines since the M4P. I can't remember what my Hexar RF did with the 75.

You can easily use 50 framelines with the 75, just keep in mind to give some space around the subject in the 50 lines.

a .85 VF or magnifier is not really needed unless you do < 1m wide open shots a lot. A properly adjusted 75/1.4 works well, and focuses easily even on Epson RD1s.
Click to expand...

So my M6 has the 75mm lines. This explains the good framing that I got. The Hexar RF may also have it. The Bessa R has 75mm lines.
 
Last edited:
raid said:
So my M6 has the 75mm lines. This explains the good framing that I got. The Hexar RF may also have it. The Bessa R has 75mm linrs.
Click to expand...

Raid,

Inside the 50mm Framelines four corners are indicated by some dashes: these are the 75mm framelines.

You are correct: the magnifier really helps under dim lighting and for close focusing. My M6 has a 0.72 VF and with the 1.40X I can still see the 50mm frames, but I have to do a little scanning. With your 0.85, it is unlikely that 1.40X will work. Probably too much.

I often use the 1.40X with a fifty BTW, and the 0.72 is kinda perfect for a 35mm. Wearing glasses limits the maximum focal length, and I wear glasses BTW. Under dim lighting the magnifier brightens the image.

Cal
 
Calzone said:
Raid,

Inside the 50mm Framelines four corners are indicated by some dashes: these are the 75mm framelines.

You are correct: the magnifier really helps under dim lighting and for close focusing. My M6 has a 0.72 VF and with the 1.40X I can still see the 50mm frames, but I have to do a little scanning. With your 0.85, it is unlikely that 1.40X will work. Probably too much.

I often use the 1.40X with a fifty BTW, and the 0.72 is kinda perfect for a 35mm. Wearing glasses limits the maximum focal length, and I wear glasses BTW. Under dim lighting the magnifier brightens the image.

Cal
Click to expand...

Cal,

I suspected this, but now I know it. Thanks.
My eyes are sharp enough to focus the lens with reasonably good light.
The 0.85 helps a lot too.
I will try the M3 next.
 
helenhill said:
TRES COOOL 'set up' Roland !!

is the M3 the Best way to go visually speaking for the 75 lux
My M6ttl is .58 ....ouch.... I know wrong Direction
but I have now moved on from my 21 & 35

strictly a 50mm Gal who might become addicted to the 75mm as well

Can Dag do something for my .58 dilemma
or is an M3 beckoning / .91
Click to expand...

Helen;before you "jump ship" on your M6 0.58x try a 1.25x viewfinder
converter. I just tried it with my 75/1.4 (built in hood) AND 35/1.2 Nokton
(regular hood) and they are usable with both lenses/ they take out the bottom right hand corner of the frame (more than 1/8th - less than a 1/4)
Hope that helps, Ivan.
great combi by the way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom