Fuji X100 Digital SOMETHING from Fujifilm

None of the mirrorless CDAF cameras have a focusing scale on the lens.
Doesn't have to be on the lens. A thumbwheel would work. But at least it should be labelled with a distance scale to allow for prefocusing without having to look in the viewfinder or on the rear LCD screen. This is essential for street photography. Such a basic feature is available on the Sigma DP1/2.

Vincent
 
There's the focus selector, with MF option. Guys... that's a focus ring. On the lens. A manual focus ring, with what amounts to an augmented-reality optical viewfinder. This camera is a firmware release away from being a true rangefinder.

Or am I crazy? I might be crazy.

I've been looking at that ring wondering the same thing. Is it confirmed that it's a MF ring?

vincentbenoit said:
Doesn't have to be on the lens. A thumbwheel would work. But at least it should be labelled with a distance scale to allow for prefocusing without having to look in the viewfinder or on the rear LCD screen. This is essential for street photography. Such a basic feature is available on the Sigma DP1/2.

I'm with you on this, Vincent. A focus/distance scale was one of the first things I looked for on the lens. It would have been a very nice addition indeed.


/
 
Manual focus is not essential for street photography... fast AF works just fine as well.

Depends on if you're looking for a decisive moment or the decisive moment, I suppose. AF takes the art away from me, and turns the whole business into a guessing game. Personally, if I can't turn a focus wheel with my eye pressed against an optical viewfinder, it ain't photography.

But that's my opinion. I know it differs from most.
 
I just started a Fuji X100 forum.

This camera seems to have captured a lot of fan's imagination.

Stephen

Stephen, does Mr. Kobayashi have something similar, too, with a true rangefinder and M lens mount? Maybe with a "ZI" on it? Pleeeaaaasse....
 
......My guess is this is the first in a line of high end compact cameras from Fuji. I'll buy one, and likely up grade as the newer variants are released.

An M9 plus any Leica 35mm lens will set you back $10,000.

For that money, you can afford to buy the X100 now [said to cost ~$1800], add a wider- or zoom-lens version later...and then some.
 
Strange.. there are definitely two versions of the X100 from the pics we've seen one with 35mm lens one with 23mm lens. WTF!?
 
ywenz, actually, I don't think there are ANY versions yet. It's an exercise in lust provocation. :)

No there are different body and different lens. Lenses have different FOV and different size aperture ring tabs.

Photokina-1_540x469.jpg


Photokina-7_540x360.jpg
 
Multiple Japanese articles are reporting expected MSRP of 120,000 - 150,000 yen so that sounds about right.

This camera is up for grabs next year. Today Silver is approaching $21/oz and Gold is close to $1,300/oz. What do you expect the exchange rate to be next year with a dollar losing value daily?

The value of gold and silver don't change. Only the relationship of the value changes, as it relates to the fluxuating value various world currencies. It's taking more dollars to buy the same amount of gold or Nikons, than it did last year at this time. And yes, the Yen changes too.

https://online.kitco.com/scripts/cgi-bin/texten.pl
 
Depends on if you're looking for a decisive moment or the decisive moment, I suppose. AF takes the art away from me, and turns the whole business into a guessing game. Personally, if I can't turn a focus wheel with my eye pressed against an optical viewfinder, it ain't photography.

But that's my opinion. I know it differs from most.

I think we are similar. :)

AF, matrix-metering, many fps... that sounds like Kyūdō, the traditional japanese art of bow shooting, with a rocket launcher. Or driving a Ferrari with an automatic gearbox - and a chauffeur.

Am I getting old? Or wise?

4819809363_bea542a784_o.jpg
 
Depends on if you're looking for a decisive moment or the decisive moment, I suppose. AF takes the art away from me, and turns the whole business into a guessing game. Personally, if I can't turn a focus wheel with my eye pressed against an optical viewfinder, it ain't photography.

But that's my opinion. I know it differs from most.

A pretty narrow view of what photography is... I don't see much difference between fast AF and zone focus honestly. I know I prefer manual focus with an M, but I'm certainly not going to say that when I use AF I'm not making photos ...

The art is not in tools used, but the finished image (to most people viewing the image).
 
Last edited:
Strange.. there are definitely two versions of the X100 from the pics we've seen one with 35mm lens one with 23mm lens. WTF!?

Prototype 1 and Prototype 2? I would go with the one in the brochure... by 35mm they probably meant equivilent on the one and actual on the other.
 
To those regretting or complaining about the fixed lens: I think this is a constraint imposed by the OVF. I would be too complicated, particularly for a first attempt, to build a zoom optical viewfinder.

That's the whole point of rangefinders, that the OVF doesn't zoom, it has frame lines. An interchangeable lens X100 would keep the same OVF, but the photographer would have the option of seeing through the lens by switching to EVF view.
 
Back
Top Bottom