thegman
Veteran
Go with your instincts, but personally I'd be keeping the MP, the only thing that puts me off is how precious I'd be over it, and be scared to take it anywhere. That problem is magnified with the M9!
The only reason to sell the Summilux would be to turn a profit, they seem to be in high demand and I (perhaps mistakenly) think I can get another and put some money towards something else. Did anyone see the 35mm Summilux that sold for $8000 recently?!
I voted to keep the whole kit, but at a minimum keep the lens. You got the best, no need to put that back on your needs list in the future.
I'd keep everything. You have 0.72x & 0.85x film bodies and a stellar standard lens. You also have a good eye and apart from the time/scanning issue you don't really need an M9. If you hanker after an M9 save your pennies and Leica may have produced a reliable digital camera by the time you have the dosh. Also reread your own blog about the allure of film... 😉
I would sell the MP (a quite overrated camera, IMHO) and keep the lens. Lenses like the 50mm Summilux ASPH made Leica famous and I am 100% sure that you would miss that lens on a FF dRF camera. 😉
I'd sell the MP and keep the Summilux ... that lens will give you the same results on a Bessa body or a beater M2 that it does on the MP.
And in the end it's all about the images ... right?
Keith, you are joking right? We all know MP owners and fanboys just fondle them, it has absolutely nothing to do with the images😀
I would sell the MP (a quite overrated camera, IMHO) and keep the lens. Lenses like the 50mm Summilux ASPH made Leica famous and I am 100% sure that you would miss that lens on a FF dRF camera. 😉