dave lackey
Veteran
Can we get a concensus on what exactly is a "Point and Shoot"?
Four cameras in four days. A Nikon 990, 995, 5400 and a Canon Sureshot A720is. These were the four cameras I used extensively for four consecutive days last week.
I find the Canon handy for taking snapshots and don't really want to be bothered with photography...rare but true. The Nikons are quite interesting with the 5400 being the best as far as being consistent and closer to what I am used to. I am getting some character images from the 990 and 995 that I did not expect. So, I will continue working with them in anticipation of making them available for my photography classes.
The 5400...is good enough to earn backup status in my bag. Not good enough for first string, but good enough to CMA for the time being as well as shoot the kids.😱
Would I classify these as P&S? Absolutely because they are not easy to use manually. Not at all. Menus are typically screwed up as with all Nikon digitals that I have used with too many menus and choices. Simplicity went out the window with Nikon years ago. But, set them up with P and sometimes Automatic, shoot away and you go away with decent images. Not the IQ I am used to but okay.
But the question is...what defines a P&S camera anyway? Any DSLR can be used as a P&S albeit a bear to lug around, etc. Is there a real definition or is it the urban myth by DSLR users that anything else is a P&S?:angel:
My first prerequisite for a NON-P&S is ease of use in manual modes.
Four cameras in four days. A Nikon 990, 995, 5400 and a Canon Sureshot A720is. These were the four cameras I used extensively for four consecutive days last week.
I find the Canon handy for taking snapshots and don't really want to be bothered with photography...rare but true. The Nikons are quite interesting with the 5400 being the best as far as being consistent and closer to what I am used to. I am getting some character images from the 990 and 995 that I did not expect. So, I will continue working with them in anticipation of making them available for my photography classes.
The 5400...is good enough to earn backup status in my bag. Not good enough for first string, but good enough to CMA for the time being as well as shoot the kids.😱
Would I classify these as P&S? Absolutely because they are not easy to use manually. Not at all. Menus are typically screwed up as with all Nikon digitals that I have used with too many menus and choices. Simplicity went out the window with Nikon years ago. But, set them up with P and sometimes Automatic, shoot away and you go away with decent images. Not the IQ I am used to but okay.
But the question is...what defines a P&S camera anyway? Any DSLR can be used as a P&S albeit a bear to lug around, etc. Is there a real definition or is it the urban myth by DSLR users that anything else is a P&S?:angel:
My first prerequisite for a NON-P&S is ease of use in manual modes.