flip
良かったね！
I checked the Massive Dev and it doesn't look right:
HP5+ Rodinal 1+25 320 15 15 20C
HP5+ Rodinal 1+25 400 6 6 6 20C
HP5+ Rodinal 1+50 400 11 11 11 20C
Right now, my roll is getting a little pre-soak.
1+50 for 9 or 10 minutes is my guess for the way to proceed.
HP5+ Rodinal 1+25 320 15 15 20C
HP5+ Rodinal 1+25 400 6 6 6 20C
HP5+ Rodinal 1+50 400 11 11 11 20C
Right now, my roll is getting a little pre-soak.
1+50 for 9 or 10 minutes is my guess for the way to proceed.
flip
良かったね！
9.5 seemed ok
MartinP
Veteran
For some reason I have never tried HP5+ in Rodinal, despite using both products.
I did a quick check of the documentation for Rodinal and HP5+ and found that Agfa didn't recommend this combination (a surprise) while Ilford suggest 11 minutes for EI400. I would expect there to be an attractive grain, moderate contrast and a 'sharp' look? It could be quite attractive in 120 and atmospheric in 135?
Now we are all wondering what your results look like . . . hint, hint
I did a quick check of the documentation for Rodinal and HP5+ and found that Agfa didn't recommend this combination (a surprise) while Ilford suggest 11 minutes for EI400. I would expect there to be an attractive grain, moderate contrast and a 'sharp' look? It could be quite attractive in 120 and atmospheric in 135?
Now we are all wondering what your results look like . . . hint, hint
flip
良かったね！
There are some that look OK. Mostly, this was a test roll with the TC-1. Close-focus is challenging, it would appear from the previews in the scanner.
Photo_Smith
Well-known
I like HP5 in 120 in Rodinal:
From memory it was 1:100 for 16 mins, I'm nowhere near my notes though...
From memory it was 1:100 for 16 mins, I'm nowhere near my notes though...
flip
良かったね！
Lots of shots focused on the background. grrr. I guess blurry shots do show grain well. :-D
A crop:
