I have a nikon D3 as a main camera with a large set of primes (mix of AF and MF). I have a nex-7 and zeiss ikon (which share some leica M-mount lenses) as secondary cameras. The D3 is great for events, the rest don't come close for that application.
What: Pentax K5
Why: I started out with Pentax so i stuck with it. I rarely use it nowadays but once there's a wedding or sth that requires a long lens I'll use it again. For everything else my RF's are enough.
I have a 5D Mark II w/ Sigma 50 1.4 and 135L for portraits, have a 17-40L for landscape and 100-400L for wildlife.
but for day to day stuff, I find it much simplier to walk around with my M6 or X100s (soon, sold my X100 and anxiously awaiting for the X100s).
plus I like to switch toys around, sometimes I'll shoot with my EOS3 or P67 for slides
Yes, I use a Nikon D300 for all professional assignments i.e. where I am being paid. But for personal work I always use film and hope to continue to. However with the loss of Ektachrome I am shooting less and less color than before and may just use digital, sticking with film for B&W.
I sold my M8 a couple of years ago and replaced it with a Nikon D3. The Nikon is immense in every sense of the word. Super fast, amazing high ISO IQ, exceptional AF oh and yes its rather large.
I bought a 5D recently too to use older lenses on which was great and its a crazy price these days but I have decided to move it on as its a touch excessive to have two full frame DSLRs.
SLRs are great for faster focusing, longer lenses and general convenience (Zooms)
I have a 28-300 VR for my D3 and its fantastic. I hated the idea of 'superzooms' but its sharp, has brilliant colours and contrast and it has VR. Its a big package and wouldn't replace a Leica M for some things but its a very usable duo and can produce stunning image quality.
Passionate amateur here, sometimes I use my wife's Nikon D5100 when I need a tele/zoom lens, like today when I was shot the vernissage of an art exhibition with my Leica x1 and my wife's DSRL. A good combination.
robert
I -- almost, but not quite -- don't see the point in color film anymore. I suppose if Kodachrome were still around I'd feel different but with my skills, I've worked hard to improve in b/w in terms of exposure and film development and scanning and post processing etc and whatever I do with color film I have to pay to have processed and scanned and it's never any better or more interesting than what I can do with my trusty D700.
d700 and d3, mostly used for paid work, including sports, weddings, etc. With strobes or flashes I vastly prefer to use digital. I tend to shoot film alongside digital often, and use film for personal projects almost exclusively.
At work I've got a Nikon D7000 for copying documents and such (I work in an archive) and event photography. But when I'm shooting for myself out comes the leica!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.