p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
Well, it could be argued that the ME Super is a refinement of the MX..
I did sell the MX pictured in my previous picture but kept the plain ME.
Well, it could be argued that the ME Super is a refinement of the MX..
Sometimes (rarely) the local classifieds throw up a gem... This popped up recently on FB Marketplace in a horribly overpriced lot along with a couple of completely cooked FE2's and a bunch of Nikkors. It took a while but eventually I convinced the seller to split off the Pentax kit 🙂
1958 Asahi Pentax S, Takumar 55/f2.2 and Takumar 135/f3.5
Depending on your source, approximately 4,000 units were produced, making the S the rarest Pentax production model. This is the first one I've seen in Aus. Finding an S with it's original matching pre-set Takumar is basically Pentaxian Holy Grail.
It's in pretty good condition all things considered. Obviously hasn't been used in a while and the shutter is a a mess. It's heading off to Alan Robertson for a full overhaul and some newly fabricated curtains.
This looks so beautiful
It’s a good start for a beginning collector. 😛Holy moly, what a line up
trouble with this sort of thread is that it induces GAS attacks
It’s a good start for a beginning collector. 😛
Well, it could be argued that the ME Super is a refinement of the MX: the availability of auto exposure is, after all, a refinement over the manual-only MX. I'm just an old grump who distrusts 40 year old electronics. I know that, with proper care, my mechanical cameras will be around as long as I will. Given that no real 35 film cameras (aside from Leicas) are currently being made, that's comforting; on the other hand, if you want or need automation, go for it; they're all tools and made to be used! And just to contradict myself, I just bought a Minolta CLE, in the full knowledge that it will almost certainly have "issues" sooner rather than later. The unique feature set outweighed my concerns over longevity.
We analog shooters are between a rock and a hard place, in many respects...