The Leica "Glow"....any pics!

The term "Leica Glow" has been the most overused and undefined optical term over the last 20 years.
If you can provide a definition in terms of optical qualities, I can probably find a lens that produces it. I have a lot of lenses.
For the "traditional use" of the term, anything made after the Summarit 5cm F1.5 and Type 1 Rigid/Dual-Range Summicron 5cm F2 have lost it.
 
The traditional term meant the trade-off between contrast and resolution that Leica engineers chose when designing lenses. Leica lenses favored absolute resolution over contrast, making for lower-contrast images with very high detail, This "Look" fell out of favor in the 1960s with many of the new optics from Japan, and Leica designs such as the second version Rigid Summicron 50/2 of the 1960s reflected the more popular look. The "Glow" was diminished.
 
I disagree a bit. I have a Cooke Amotal 2" (50mm) f/2.0. It has the touted "Cooke Look" about it which motivates cinematographers to use the cinema lenses. Glare? I wonder. It does seem to add a bit of radiance and glow to photos. Maybe it was the KoolAid I drank but I am a believer. Here is an early morning shot of a boat in the yard here in town: https://flic.kr/p/2nJBxT1

This is a link to the album. The Rhodies just glow while still being sharp, in focus. A nice lens. https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjzQSJS

As in all things here, YMMV

I am also fond of the Canon 50mm f/1.8 (https://flic.kr/p/2n1kmdk) and the not quite as glowing but still good Jupiter 8, when you have a good copy. Leitz is not the only good lens grinder.

These are my opinions and worth just what you paid for them.
 
Back
Top Bottom