D
Deleted member 65559
Guest
Thank you Yossi. I could happily live with the Canon 3.5
Thank you Yossi. I could happily live with the Canon 3.5
I happen to have all the three 28mm lenses mentioned above: Canon 28/3.5 chrome, Canon 28/2.8 chrome, and VC28/3.5 black.
I took some random test shots with each lens on M9M out of my window and attach three similar pictures here for your comparison. (All at f3.5)
[photos removed]
So who is the fairer of them?
Interesting comparison. My first reaction was to say the VC was my favourite, the f/3.5 Canon next, then the f/2.8 Canon in a distant last.
Looking again (and much closer): the f/2.8 seems sharper and more detailed in the centre, but the edge sharpness is awful. The f/3.5 is slightly worse in the centre but much more even overall.
Is the edge performance on the f/2.8 Canon characteristic of the lens or is it just poor performance on digital? I know my Canon 35/1.8 looks similarly bad when I use it on my Fuji X bodies, regardless of aperture.
I'll have the sharpness of the Color-Skopar with the tonality of the Canon 28/2.8, please.
As a side note, the Color Skopar 28mm f3.5 can be found in Nikon rangefinder mount for much less than the LTM version.
.....i don't have any Nikons..... just Leica M.
Just get an Amedeo adapter. Head Bartender is selling them again.
Just get an Amedeo adapter. Head Bartender is selling them again.
If the LTM Color Skopar is going for $700, for that much money you could buy the lens in Nikon rangefinder mount and have enough money left over to buy a Nikon S2 or possibly even an S3.to use it on.
You may have meant to also include the Kobalux 28/3.5 ltm. It is a very good 28mm lens. I sold off my Canon 28/3.5 ltm and kept the Kobalux and the Rokkor-M 28/2.8M.The Canon 28mm f3.5 is a fine lens and can be found at reasonable prices. Probably your best bet but there are also 28's from Komura, Acall and Avenon that are supposed to be good and sometimes can be found at good prices. Good Luck.