x-ray
Veteran
You were indicating you didn’t understand why prices were going up which suggests you don’t know why. Yes I’d you’d thought about it a minute you might have come up with the reason.
This is your quote that I responded to.We are three years later, but there is still no prospect of new Adox paper. Ilford raises her prices again and again. At Fotoimpex in Berlin, a box of 100 sheets of Ilford 7 x 9.5 in now costs EUR 132.90.
Adox are making a lot of paper, just not the MCC110 that Erik is looking for.I wouldn't hold my breath for Adox to make paper anytime soon, if ever. If they wanted to make it they would.
Since Xray mentioned color film I am also leaning toward just shooting digital most of the time. I still like the process of film and have a bunch of it laying around. Black and white though is way different so I stick with film for that. Color I can go either way.
There are a lot of ways to make a print too. I use up my old silver gelatin paper by making lumen prints. The paper isn't good to print on since it is so foggy. Lith printing is another option for old silver paper. Not all papers lith or lumen well, but some do. I also make cyanotypes and occasionally gum prints. Those require a digital neg though. Cyanotypes in particular are fairly cheap to make.
I've been using Ilford warmtone lately. That stuff ain't cheap. It is the best paper around now though, not that there is much choice.
RC or resin coated is a misnomer as the paper is actually a paper layer sandwiched between two layers of polythene. This means the paper layer does not get wet during processing. We called it "plastic paper". It was not sustainable at all. It discolored in front of you. If you stacked the photos, they stuck together. Pure waste of money. It had a plastic smell too.Adox are making a lot of paper, just not the MCC110 that Erik is looking for.
I do almost all my silver printing on Adox Lupex, a silver (mostly) chloride printing paper for contact printing. They also make a resin coated multigrade paper branded Fotoimpex. And they are still progressing their development of Polywarmton.
Marty
RC paper is fine for what it is - quick prints for proofing, or unfussy clients. Yes, we purists all prefer fibre base paper, and the surface textures are particularly amazing. I have prints going back to the 1980s and the only ones I have ever had discolour were FB prints that weren’t fixed properly.RC or resin coated is a misnomer as the paper is actually a paper layer sandwiched between two layers of polythene. This means the paper layer does not get wet during processing. We called it "plastic paper". It was not sustainable at all. It discolored in front of you. If you stacked the photos, they stuck together. Pure waste of money. It had a plastic smell too.
They stopped making MCC110 because they sourced the paper used for it from Ilford, their biggest competitor. Ilford themselves made sure that the paper was so expensive that MCC110 could not remain a cheaper alternative to Ilford Multigrade FB. However, that was many years ago. It's hard for me to believe that Adox can't find another paper. That's why I don't understand the situation.
Erik.
Have you tried Bergger or Foma? Foma is substantially cheaper than Ilford, and although the exposure and development times differ, it has a similar base colour and can provide a similar tonal range. The FB glossy is Fomatone MG 131. It is €58.50 for 50 sheets of 18x24cm including tax at Fotoimpex. That’s at least some choice, but we also have to understand that this is becoming a niche alternative process.No, I wouldn't buy MCC110 when it was more expensive than Ilford MGFB. MGFB is the better paper - the white is quite a lot whiter than MCC 110 - and I would buy MCC110 only if it was 3/4 of the price of Ilford MGFB. But now there is no choice. That's not good.
gelatin silver print (ilford mgfb) summar 50mm f2 (leica m3)
Amsterdam 2023
Erik.
![]()