Mechanical XPAN, is it possible?

In actuality a mechanical Xpan has nothing to do with film/digital. It's a beautifully designed if very specific camera. The kicker is that because of the electronics involved, it could end up being a $ 5,000 brick. I have no doubt that if we were back in the '80s say, when mechanical cameras were being built.....several companies could have built it. If you could build a Fuji 617 or a Linhof Technorama.... why not an Xpan? It's just that no one is building those kind of cameras any more.
 
Deardorff38 said:
🤣 ....then you'd have to ask to have your film hand inspected.....
Click to expand...

I'd keep it as a curiosity. I sent all my film cameras on to Sonnar Brian a while back. Not a lot but a few. ME Super, AE-1 and an XA-3 IIRC. Oh, and the stone ax that will take a photograph, the K1000. All in working order.
 
Deardorff38 said:
In actuality a mechanical Xpan has nothing to do with film/digital. It's a beautifully designed if very specific camera. The kicker is that because of the electronics involved, it could end up being a $ 5,000 brick. I have no doubt that if we were back in the '80s say, when mechanical cameras were being built.....several companies could have built it. If you could build a Fuji 617 or a Linhof Technorama.... why not an Xpan? It's just that no one is building those kind of cameras any more.
Click to expand...
i think a big part of why is if you are going to build a camera why not go with larger negatives? They are also easier from a film advance point of view. I say that having built 6x12, 6x17 and 6x24 and adapting others for 35mm panoramic.

There are people making 35mm panoramic cameras. Check out the oxygen panomicron for example.
 
shawn said:
i think a big part of why is if you are going to build a camera why not go with larger negatives? They are also easier from a film advance point of view. I say that having built 6x12, 6x17 and 6x24 and adapting others for 35mm panoramic.

There are people making 35mm panoramic cameras. Check out the oxygen panomicron for example.
Click to expand...
The 'oxygen' (no longer available) is a cool idea. I always prefer medium format film, but since 220 is dead, there's no doubt 35 is more convenient for panoramics. As i see it, the attractive selling point of the Xpan were: a built-in light meter, the fact that it could do single frame or panoramics, and had 3 high quality interchangeable lenses. So you have a svelte camera you could take as an only camera on a trip. Quite a bit different than a 617.... Having said that, I'd be a sucker for a Fuji G-W 680 IV with 3 interchangeable lenses.
 
Deardorff38 said:
In actuality a mechanical Xpan has nothing to do with film/digital. It's a beautifully designed if very specific camera. The kicker is that because of the electronics involved, it could end up being a $ 5,000 brick. I have no doubt that if we were back in the '80s say, when mechanical cameras were being built.....several companies could have built it. If you could build a Fuji 617 or a Linhof Technorama.... why not an Xpan? It's just that no one is building those kind of cameras any more.
Click to expand...


This thread started about building a mechanical Xpan from something else. This has meant analog. Various film bodies have been deconstructed and have had new noses grafted onto them. The nature of the project seems to point it at analog. Digitally this problem was solved with the first digital editor.
Deardorff38 said:
The 'oxygen' (no longer available) is a cool idea. I always prefer medium format film, but since 220 is dead, there's no doubt 35 is more convenient for panoramics. As i see it, the attractive selling point of the Xpan were: a built-in light meter, the fact that it could do single frame or panoramics, and had 3 high quality interchangeable lenses. So you have a svelte camera you could take as an only camera on a trip. Quite a bit different than a 617.... Having said that, I'd be a sucker for a Fuji G-W 680 IV with 3 interchangeable lenses.
Click to expand...

I have been a 35mm guy since around '53 or ;43. My first was the Voigtlaender Vito II which you see alongside my posts. I bought 100' or 200' rolls of Tri-X and loaded and developed my own crap. 8 - 10 hours in rooms dimly lit with red lights were my Saturdays. I learned from that. I learned I was not very good. Repititio, repititio, repititio. Practice can improve if it is possble. The jury is out.

I have always had a closet lust for medium format, the Swedish one. I remember it from back in the Vito II days. The lust lingered and never went away. When the X2D came out I sold the wife, kids, grandchildren into slavery and both kidneys and bought one with the XCD55V. It shoots XPan natively. And any Sonnars I have cover the 44 x 33 sensor so they work, too. I have yet to test any 35mm format wide-angles.

So I have beaten the mechanical hack of the XPan but I must have daily dialysis and keep a constant lookout for Interpol. ;o)
 
Last edited:
Deardorff38 said:
The 'oxygen' (no longer available) is a cool idea. I always prefer medium format film, but since 220 is dead, there's no doubt 35 is more convenient for panoramics. As i see it, the attractive selling point of the Xpan were: a built-in light meter, the fact that it could do single frame or panoramics, and had 3 high quality interchangeable lenses. So you have a svelte camera you could take as an only camera on a trip. Quite a bit different than a 617.... Having said that, I'd be a sucker for a Fuji G-W 680 IV with 3 interchangeable lenses.
Click to expand...
I'd say there is no doubt digital is more convenient for panoramics. You have built in light meter, more options than just single frame or panoramic (ex: 3:2.4:3, 16:9. 1:1, 65:23, 2:1 in my S1R) and the equivalent of interchangeable backs (different ISOs, B&W or color) without having to carry interchangeable backs.

Having said that I still also shoot film panoramics too as I enjoy the process and results I get from them as well.

Aren't you basically describing a G690?
 
boojum said:
I have always had a closet lust for medium format, the Swedish one. I remember it from back in the Vito II days. The lust lingered and never went away. When the X2D came out I sold the wife, kids, grandchildren into slavery and both kidneys and bought one with the XCD55V. It shoots XPan natively. And any Sonnars I have cover the 44 x 33 sensor so they work, too. I have yet to test any 35mm format wide-angles.
Click to expand...
Things like the Nikon 24mm f2.8 will work in panoramic format but not full frame. That is a nice lens on digital MF. The Voigtlander 21mm f3.5 will cover 65:24 and 1x1 and that lens is basically the xPan with the 45mm in 65:24 and the equivalent of the SWC in 1:1. It was a very fun walkaround lens on my GFX50 switching between those two aspect ratios.

The old Nikon PC 28mm and 35mm will cover full frame and even let you shift a bit too.
 
shawn said:
I'd say there is no doubt digital is more convenient for panoramics. You have built in light meter, more options than just single frame or panoramic (ex: 3:2.4:3, 16:9. 1:1, 65:23, 2:1 in my S1R) and the equivalent of interchangeable backs (different ISOs, B&W or color) without having to carry interchangeable backs.

Having said that I still also shoot film panoramics too as I enjoy the process and results I get from them as well.

Aren't you basically describing a G690?
Click to expand...
Well perhaps but that camera is long in the tooth (I had one).... but i would bite for a modern version.
Let's face it you can crop any film size to panoramic. I've used 120/4x5/5x7/4x10/8x10.... and you could produce a panoramic print from any of them.
 
Long in the tooth but still extremely capable and available for a song (relatively) at this point.

Yes, you can crop any film or digital to panoramic but I find it better to compose if I see the aspect ratio while shooting. When I shot panoramic without built in panoramic ARs I was more sloppy with my framing since I knew I was just going to be cropping in post.
 
Here's a so-so shot of a pasture of a farm close to the Columbia River between Portland and Astoria. The beauty is being able to switch formats in seconds. This pic is a farm near the Columbia River about halfway from Portland to Astoria. It is a nice scene but the light is off. Maybe another day. It is sweet to be able to pull up this format along with the others.

B0001317 by West Phalia, on Flickr​
 
Last edited:
boojum said:
This thread started about building a mechanical Xpan from something else. This has meant analog. Various film bodies have been deconstructed and have had new noses grafted onto them. The nature of the project seems to point it at analog. Digitally this problem was solved with the first digital editor.


I have been a 35mm guy since around '53 or ;43. My first was the Voigtlaender Vito II which you see alongside my posts. I ought 100' or 200' rolls of Tri-X and loaded and developed my own crap. 8 - 10 hours in rooms dimly lit with red lights were my Saturdays. I learned from that. I learned I was not very good. Repititio, repititio, repititio. Practice can improve if it is possble. The jury is out.

I have always had a closet lust for medium format, the Swedish one. I remember it from back in the Vito II days. The lust lingered and never went away. When the X2D came out I sold the wife, kids, grandchildren into slavery and both kidneys and bought one with the XCD55V. It shoots XPan natively. And any Sonnars I have cover the 44 x 33 sensor so they work, too. I have yet to test any 35mm format wide-angles.

So I have beaten the mechanical hack of the XPan but I must have daily dialysis and keep a constant lookout for Interpol. ;o)
Click to expand...
Sounds like you got a good deal, but we don't all have your resources; I don't have kids or grandchildren, and my partner's too old to sell for anything but rendering down at the glue factory. And I doubt that anyone would want my 72-year-old kidneys. Life is so unfair!
 
Here's my mechanical Xpan. Canon 7 body hacked to 63mm frame. Modded for continuous advance, two strokes needed via stop for correct spacing. Fuji 45mm f5.6 lens (from GS645W) on Kodak/Compur shutter and recycled helicoid. RF modified to couple the lens.

Canon 7 Panoramic mod by Olivier, on Flickr

Canon 7 pano mod by Olivier, on Flickr
 
shawn said:
Long in the tooth but still extremely capable and available for a song (relatively) at this point.

Yes, you can crop any film or digital to panoramic but I find it better to compose if I see the aspect ratio while shooting. When I shot panoramic without built in panoramic ARs I was more sloppy with my framing since I knew I was just going to be cropping in post.
Click to expand...
I think I'll experiment with Minox 8x11 panoramic photos. I think if I carry the tripod with the degree'd head and use a six frame sequence work flow (66x8mm effective format), I can get some interesting results.

I'll let you know how it goes. 😉

G
 
Godfrey said:
I think I'll experiment with Minox 8x11 panoramic photos. I think if I carry the tripod with the degree'd head and use a six frame sequence work flow (66x8mm effective format), I can get some interesting results.

I'll let you know how it goes. 😉

G
Click to expand...
You just need to make a Minox version of this....

53623976578_e2c9d619db_h.jpg
 
3d printing is fantastic for building your own cameras.

51898780364_17de181e16_h.jpg


There are lots of interesting options out there. Just make sure there is some manor of adjusting the camera for your specific lens. Some just send the same cone based on the specc'd flange focal length. I've built at least 50 cameras for the Super Angulon 90mm f8 and they are *not* all the same. I've see maybe +/- 2mm difference between them. That is the difference between sharp images and not sharp on a scale focused camera.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom