Pentax 17 and film photography is the top story on Japan Today

Disappointed_Horse

Well-known
Local time
11:42 PM
Joined
Oct 26, 2009
Messages
1,059
New film cameras are rare on the market nowadays, and when one turns up it's most definitely news. So yes, a good article, if bland in parts and written in a rather clerical style - a little short on data, mostly general statements. A typical feature. But on an interesting topic.

I was not aware of Japan Today. This morning I went back to that site to reread the Pentax article, but I found it was gone from Page 1. Looked around but didn't find it at first. Eventually I googled 'Pentax 17' in search and located it - also another story dated June 30, which revealed this new Pentax is really a Ricoh.

A few photo web sites have already posted reviews of this latest Pentax offer. Which looks promising. A particularly good one in Casual Photofile, with many fine images.

If it stimulates yet more film sales, well, why not? With the absurdly high price of film nowadays half frame makes sense. Whether the resolution will stand enlarging to, say, 8x10" has yet to be put to the test. Most 35mm photographers rarely print above 5x7" anyway, so this lesser 'standard' may be more realistic.

Here in Australia, most photographers I knew are casually interested in this new Pentax. Already a few retailers are taking orders at the AUD $850-$900 mark. With our crummy South Pacific peso stuck on 66 US cents, this almost-$1000 price tag is much too rich for the blood of many of us who will have to go back to the less than exciting Ebay offers for used gear.

(Added later) Raydm6, many thanks for your (subsequent to this) post. I stand corrected on that point.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. Love this:
Pentax engineers used archive drawings of past cameras, some on paper, to try and make manual winders and other analogue technology.

But they struggled, so the company asked retired colleagues to come back to help.

"They taught us tips and tricks that were not on the blueprints, but were really recipes in the engineer's head," Suzuki said. By doing so, they "revived the old technology little by little".
 
I follow a lot of foreign new sites (mostly because I can't stand the American news media). I clicked on Japan Today and the top story is about film photography and the Pentax 17:

Japan Today

In case the story gets bumped from the front page: https://japantoday.com/category/business/new-japan-film-camera-aimed-at-'nostalgic'-young-fans.

Good to see our hobby getting positive media coverage!
Kai W isn't American, he and his buddy got those cameras in hands, reviewed with actual photos from cameras a while ago.


So, Japan Today is yesterday news. 🙂 But I feel for you. Where I came from, news from America is the sin to read.
 
I am not part of the target demographic but it is quite fun to follow how it is going, and very positive that it is being so succesful! Helps out the ecosystem and validates future developments. Helen laments the loss of Neopan 1600, and I hope this sends a signal to the compatriot Fuji group which is not providing film as it did in the past. Supposedly during the project, Pentax consulted the film manufacturers. They did visit Ilford as per social media posts, but no idea about Kodak or Fuji.

If it stimulates yet more film sales, well, why not? With the absurdly high price of film nowadays half frame makes sense. Whether the resolution will stand enlarging to, say, 8x10" has yet to be put to the test. Most 35mm photographers rarely print above 5x7" anyway, so this lesser 'standard' may be more realistic.
Actually Pentax got a good point there, Half frame shoots vertical which is naturally compatible with phones.
I would not be surprised that prints might be rarely done, following a bit the discussion of non returned negatives and scan based end imaging. It's just a demographic that we don't capture in the forums. Also, the "defects" of a smaller format = more film look 😀
 
AUD $900 for this babe at my Australian camera dealer. They have one in stock as a demo, but they haven't had an order yet.

We are all crying poor down here these days. Our lousy US 65 cent dollar doesn't buy much any more.

From everything I've read and the user reviews, it's a fine camera. But pricey. Hopefully it will be worth it to whoever buys one.
 
Last edited:
I had a 17 on preorder but then cancelled, as I decided to finish up restoring a Canon Demi EE17 instead. Had to fix a corroded wire to the battery compartment, and refinished in black paint.

The Demi is also half-frame, 30mm/1.7 lens instead of 28/3.5.

Will shoot the first roll soon!

 
Back
Top Bottom