Also again, film vs digital. In film you have to hit the silver halilide (or other particles) suspended in the emulsion which has a certain depth to it, so there is a certain amount of focus "leeway" built into the medium. In a digital camera you have to hit the micro lens above the imaging (photon) well pretty much exactly or it won't look sharp. This is by the way one of the reasons digital lenses are so large - it's optically a very hard problem to solve while making sure that the incoming rays also hit the sensor in a perpendicular fashion, but I digress...
I have noticed this in the real world with a "focus test" Nex 5N camera which I use for repair and have modified to remove the AF linkage (so it won't hit the back of biogon and other lenses) and shimming the mount to be perfectly in focus with L39 (LTM) lenses.
However, I have found that even with the shim being perfect, for example, all Sonnar lenses read as going over infinity, whereas Tessar and Planar type lenses read spot on. I have also had certain wide angle lenses (the Ricoh GR 28mm) read as not quite reaching infinity on the digital camera but again the lens was fine when used with film - even wide open when checked at very high magnification.