Is the Canon 7S really that good?
- Thread starter wrs1145
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 40
- Views 7K
The Spastic Image
Established
I am a happy L1 shooter, and wouldn't mind a VI-L to go with it and a nicer condition L1 to go with my street beater. (which works impeccably). Spastic me likes his cameras with just enough battle scars so I don't get emotional running film through them.
wlewisiii
Veteran
Some people like that trigger ... thing... Sane people don't. What more can I really say?
I'll stick with the P for my next Canon 😉
I'll stick with the P for my next Canon 😉
Dante_Stella
Rex canum cattorumque
If you are left-eyed, it makes perfect sense to use a trigger or a winder. You don't want to poke yourself in the right eye with a lever.
I'm not as hot on the P as I once was; the VI series has a 1:1 finder (50/100) but doesn't try to use that for 35mm. On the P, it's not easy to see the 35mm lines in a 1:1. No framelines for 35mm on the VI (just a 0.7x view), but given that the P framelines do not correct for field size anyway, it's a minor thing.
ACullen
Well-known
I tried P, 7, 7sz and the Canon L2. I kept the latter because I found its viewfinder was the easiest to use with glasses and it was way smaller than the 7sz. The selectable RF is such a boon for nailing focus. Coupled external viewfinders mean that you can have a bright VF and use the in camera VF on the RF setting. The V type finders are a little hard to come by but do turn up from time to time.
das
Well-known
The VI really needed a parallax-corrected 35mm frameline. The view is not very accurate (maybe 90%?) and it pretty barrel-distorted. But it is alot easier to use and frame than the P, whose 35mm frameline is nearly impossible to see, especially with glasses. The Nikon S3's 35mm frameline sucks as well.
aw614
Well-known
I don't know how I feel about the 7, been pondering selling mine, something about the overall experience I don't like as much as the L1/L2 and even the older barnack like IVS I have. On paper its great, but it is a lot of the little things about it that bug me some really dumb like the feel and look of the film advance lever, to having a nice viewfinder, but a really weird patch that has this weird shadow like thing to it. Mine has a responsive light meter, and it seems close enough, but not something I would trust without another meter on me
The size isn't an issue for me, but somehow it feels "cheaper" to me over the earlier models which is odd.
The size isn't an issue for me, but somehow it feels "cheaper" to me over the earlier models which is odd.
CanonCollector
Newbie
The 7s/7sZ were the pinnacle of Canon rangefinder production, and are fantastic cameras to use IMO, especially for their viewfinders (the 7sZ is a little better with upgraded optics). That being said, I prefer the V series with the Canon parralex corrected top viewfinders, which are beautifully bright.
The VI series is also great, but the viewfinder lines have a tendency to fade away, making the top finders a necessity (it’s also hard to find a good buy on a VI L, but if you don’t mind the bottom trigger wind, the VI T is great). The 7 series body is just a little bit bigger, but still handles very well and has parralex corrected frame lines for 35mm to 135mm.
I’m also a fan of the P, but if you wear glasses the 35mm frame lines can be very hard to see. The shutter mechanisms are all basically the same starting with the IV SB 2, so they are all equally reliable. Don’t be too concerned with metal shutter curtains that have wrinkles (unless they are severe), minor dimples and wrinkles have no effect on operation.
The VI series is also great, but the viewfinder lines have a tendency to fade away, making the top finders a necessity (it’s also hard to find a good buy on a VI L, but if you don’t mind the bottom trigger wind, the VI T is great). The 7 series body is just a little bit bigger, but still handles very well and has parralex corrected frame lines for 35mm to 135mm.
I’m also a fan of the P, but if you wear glasses the 35mm frame lines can be very hard to see. The shutter mechanisms are all basically the same starting with the IV SB 2, so they are all equally reliable. Don’t be too concerned with metal shutter curtains that have wrinkles (unless they are severe), minor dimples and wrinkles have no effect on operation.
filmphoto
Newbie
The Canon 7sZ is a great camera. It is easy to find online. But unlike older Leica rangefinder film cameras, I found that it was a challenge to find anyone who would service / CLA / adjust rangefinder for this model Canon camera. I finally found Paramount camera in Saskatoon, Canada.
FYI for those of you who need to service your 7sZ.
www.paramountcamerarepair.com
FYI for those of you who need to service your 7sZ.
Paramount Camera Repair - Saskatoon, Canada Repairs, Cleaning, CLAs
Serving all of Canada and the US, Saskatoon's premier Camera and Lens repair shop. Computer Lens calibrations. MTF testing. Lens rebuilding. DSLR cameras. Canada's best source for used cameras and lenses. Beginners Online Camera Photography Course.
www.paramountcamerarepair.com
Godfrey
somewhat colored
I don't have any stick in the Canon RF line because I've never seen one in person, in 62 years of doing photography. Not one person I've known outside of this forum has ever had one either; when I was 'in the business' selling cameras, film, and processing, none of my customers ever showed up with one.
From my perspective, they're purely mythological. 😉
G
From my perspective, they're purely mythological. 😉
G
DavidC
Established
The Canon 7 line is a bit on the heavy side and the rangefinder patch is plagued by a ghost image. After using the Leica Ms you'd be hard-pressed to go back to Canon even though some models like the P and IV-L are very attractive indeed.
ddutchison2
Well-known
I'd take a Leica M over a Canon 7 any day, if they were the same price, or even anywhere close to a similar price.
filmphoto
Newbie
I agree with David C and ddutchison2 but the canon 7 sZ with a great canon f1.4 lens was much less $$ than a similar condition Leica M4. The other Leica models were even more expensive. I bought it as a less expensive starter camera gift for someone.
Guth
Appreciative User
Just a quick word of thanks for this thread as it caused me to take a closer look at some of these Canon rangefinders that I know so little about. Beautiful cameras!
filmphoto
Newbie
Peter Dechert's book on Canon Rangefinder Cameras is fun to read if you are considering a purchase. It is a nice review from 1933-1968. It is no longer in print, but you might get lucky and find an inexpensive copy online.
8bit Barry
Member
Is there anywhere to get a PDF download? I have managed to track down his Canon SLR book, but that was while trying to find the Canon Rangefinder bible he wrote
8bit Barry
Member
And I wanted to say to the original poster - I hope it is as I have one turning up any day now from Japan!
Retro-Grouch
Veteran
You've been a member of RFF for five days, and you're already succumbing to GAS! Welcome; you will really feel at home here! 😉
filmphoto
Newbie
Last year I was lucky and found a $25 copy that I gave as a gift to someone, but I have searched and have not found a free download. I wish that I had better advice to give you, but the currently available advertised copies are exorbitantly expensive ($149). I would keep looking online, or at used book stores that might be near you, for copies at more reasonable prices.
8bit Barry
Member
Haha, yeah I’ve got it pretty bad - the VT Deluxe I bought last month is superb, I shot a roll of 36 and just two were out of focus. Superb first roll.
I used a 7s last weekend, the viewfinder was so big and bright I had to get one, being delivered this week.
Photography / journalism is my job so there spanners in a toolbox so to speak. I’ve been shooting my 50 f1.2 LTM on my Canon R3 and it’s a superb optic for everything, with beautiful bokeh - so yeah I’ve got GAS real bad right now
Similar threads
