Burning Kodachrome slides and erasing history

Archiver

Veteran
Local time
10:24 AM
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
3,097
Location
Melbourne, Australia
The current thread about Nick Ut and the Terror of War image brought something else to mind, a flickr thread from 2008. The OP asked about the best way to destroy the hundreds of Kodachrome slides that were taken by his Japanese war photographer father in law. The OP mentioned a batch of slides labeled Pinkville 1968, which refers to the My Lai Massacre, the largest massacre perpetrated by the US in Vietnam, indeed, anywhere in the 20th century. The fact that his father in law still had photographs of My Lai suggests that they have not been seen elsewhere.


The OP wrote:

"Is it safe (environmentally) to burn slides?

"Here's why:
My wife's father was a long-time war photographer and photojournalist for the Japanese press. He was active in the Korean war, French-Indochina, (later the Viet Nam conflict,) Japan, the Philippines and Central America, especially Nicaragua from the mid-fifties until about 1990 or so. As you can imagine, back then, there were a lot of photos to be taken that wouldn't exactly be publishable, given the standards of the times. Still, like any good journalist, he took his photos. The things he shot are, for the most part, what you'd expect, but there are things he saw and photographed that would make Abu Ghraib look like games at a children's birthday party.

"Before he died, he asked me, (knowing my interest in photography,) to make sure these images never see the light of day. "Burn them all" was the phrase he used.

"So here I am, left with a large filing cabinet of slides that I need to destroy. I took a few handfuls of slides and tried to burn then in a bin outside, but the smoke was surprising—thick and foul-smelling. (Those were just a fraction of the stuff he asked me to burn first, the pictures labeled "Pinkville, 1968". Horrible stuff that should never be seen.)

"I've considered shredding them somehow, or pouring a solvent on the lot, but I need to make sure that what I do is permanent and eradicates the images beyond retrieval. I'd also like to do this in a way that doesn't harm both the environment or my own health.

'(Ideally, by burning, as that was his dying request.)

"Any suggestions?"


There was quite the debate between those who thought the OP should honour his father in law's dying wishes and burn everything, and those who thought that preserving vital documentation of war was more important. I was firmly on the side of preservation, despite the photographer's wishes.

The irony is that the family ultimately decided to donate the collection to the Yasukuni Jinja war museum on the condition that the photos never be exhibited, copied or be available to the public. Yasukuni is controversial in that it permitted the enshrinement of Japanese soldiers and officers charged and convicted with war crimes.

This article is about war photographer Ron Haeberle, who's photos showed what happened at My Lai. If this is what Ron shot, what did the unnamed Japanese photographer shoot?


(edited to correct links)
 
Last edited:
The "noble scholar" side of me says they should all be made public. We should know who and what we are. The public is not obliged to see the images. Viewing is voluntary. But to bury them is to bury history and that is always dangerous and often done to protect the guilty. The military is necessary for failures of diplomacy. Here we are lucky that our forefathers made the military swear allegiance to our founding documents and not a current head of state. Regardless, our military is not infallible and in a mobilization folks do not check too closely.

I would have liked to have seen a public display made of the least disturbing photos, the rest available for scholarly study. Hiding them under cover of a donation to a war museum is an unfortunate burying of fact and history. History is not what we always want it to be but it always is what it is.
 
The "noble scholar" side of me says they should all be made public. We should know who and what we are. The public is not obliged to see the images. Viewing is voluntary. But to bury them is to bury history and that is always dangerous and often done to protect the guilty. The military is necessary for failures of diplomacy. Here we are lucky that our forefathers made the military swear allegiance to our founding documents and not a current head of state. Regardless, our military is not infallible and in a mobilization folks do not check too closely.

I would have liked to have seen a public display made of the least disturbing photos, the rest available for scholarly study. Hiding them under cover of a donation to a war museum is an unfortunate burying of fact and history. History is not what we always want it to be but it always is what it is.
I fully agree. Images like those are vital parts of history that should not be suppressed nor denied. A public exhibition or at least public access would have been far more fitting and appropriate.

What gets me is that Ron Haeberle's images are the only ones generally known to exist, and yet there was a Japanese war photographer who had his own collection that had gone seemingly unknown for decades, and now will never be seen.
 
I fully agree. Images like those are vital parts of history that should not be suppressed nor denied. A public exhibition or at least public access would have been far more fitting and appropriate.

What gets me is that Ron Haeberle's images are the only ones generally known to exist, and yet there was a Japanese war photographer who had his own collection that had gone seemingly unknown for decades, and now will never be seen.

Destroying documents at the request of the deceased regardless of their historical import happens. If it is their property they can ask that this be done. For some strange reason they, themselves, never do it.
 
This thread has taken a life of its own beyond the discussion of Ut. I think of the Viet Nam war and our involvement as a Tar-Baby, we are stuck with it and will be for a long time. It defines the time, it defines our ethos, it defines our political splits and asks the question of which direction shall we take.

I hunted down this image because it, too, is iconic, A Horst Faas shot: The Story Behind the Iconic Photo of a Soldier Wearing a Hand-Lettered “War is Hell” Slogan on His Helmet during the Vietnam War in 1965 - Rare Historical Photos The sad part is that we are not doing more with diplomacy and less with arms.
 
Last edited:
The feelings of today may and most likely will not be the same as those of tomorrow. What seems as a burden for people who have been involved may be precious fact to fight against the propaganda of the future. Never erase documents of history as they may become the basis of how future generations view the world and justify how they are acting.
 
Back
Top Bottom