Dogman
Veteran
I'm guessing the joke is referencing this.
Another one of those websites you have to register to enter. I don't use those. My information is already scattered across the web far too much.
........................................
I'm guessing the joke is referencing this.
Sorry, cant get to the page, dont want to register.I'm guessing the joke is referencing this.
You don't have to use AI to be endangered by it. The wonder of AI is how much power it grants people who love to cut corners, and for whom "it looks good enough to fool somebody" is the ultimate standard of quality.
Like belladonna, thorn apple and many other healthy herbs from our garden.fun fact: fly agaric isn't really that poisonous and can be quiet healthy in small amounts. Just have to dry them for a while to get rid of that ibotenic acid. Ibotenic acid turns into Muscimol when letting it dry for a while (decarboxylation). After that bigger amounts will not kill you, they will just be very 'trippy'. You can eat about 10 fully grown Agarics before they become poisonous.
actually it is very different from the poisonous nightshade plants. once you decarbed them there is no more poison in them. Muscimol is just a GABA receptor agonist and not considered a poison. afaikLike belladonna, thorn apple and many other healthy herbs from our garden.
😵💫
You are right. Maybe I have been short-sighted by the amount of useless material posted online.The problem is not AI. The problem are the people who are to lazy to think for themself.
The problem are people who dont ask the right question.


You perfectly demonstrate why AI (marketing) is nonsense. The beauty of computers if that they do exactly what you program them to do. The beauty of AI is, we are told, that you don't have to think like a programmer to use it, it's "smart" and understands what we mean. When in reality it's just a glorified interpreter, except worse because it can't be counted on for accuracy even if you're precise with your word choice and syntax. Worse still, because nobody is privy to its internal workings, there's no accurate way to troubleshoot, it's all trial and error. Wouldn't it be great if when AI didn't understand it would simply print "syntax error"? (Instead of trying to bullsh!t you or get you killed).Sorry, cant get to the page, dont want to register.
In my bookshelf there is enough literature about plants and mushrooms.
The problem is not AI. The problem are the people who are to lazy to think for themself.
The problem are people who dont ask the right question.
Is this mushrom edible (eatable)?
Is it harmful to health?
Is it poison?
You recognice the difference in the questions ?/!
"Madness takes its toll"You are right. Maybe I have been short-sighted by the amount of useless material posted online.
I would also add the people who profit from littering the internet with junk.
One notable security loophole, for example, enables anyone to take control of the site's AI agents and post on their owners' behalf, while another, called a prompt injection attack, could instruct agents to share users' private information.
"Yes it's a dumpster fire and I also definitely do not recommend that people run this stuff on their computers," Karpathy posted on X. "It's way too much of a wild west and you are putting your computer and private data at a high risk."
Security
Since its launch in January 2026, Moltbook has been cited by cybersecurity researchers as a significant vector for indirect prompt injection. Because the platform requires agents to ingest and process untrusted data from other agents, malicious posts can override an agent's core instructions. Furthermore, the OpenClaw "Skills" framework has been criticized for lacking a robust sandbox, potentially allowing for remote code execution (RCE) on host machines. Researchers have demonstrated that "heartbeat" loops—which fetch updates every few hours—can be hijacked to exfiltrate private API keys or execute unauthorized shell commands.<a href="Moltbook - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>15<span>]</span></a>
Slightly off topic, I have just seen this review in the Guardian:
![]()
Requiem for a film-maker: Darren Aronofsky’s AI revolutionary war series is a horror
The once-lauded director of Black Swan and The Wrestler has drowned himself in AI slop with an embarrassing new online serieswww.theguardian.com
I get that AI helps in a lot of areas. But why it has to try to replace human actors?
For some context:News from today: French police raiding X offices...