Leica M8 : Trouble In Paradise

P

POINT OF VIEW

Established
Local time
10:47 AM
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
190
View My Gallery
When you buy a new M8, you receive a offer to send by post for a free copy of, LFI, ( Leica Fotografie International). The magazine is the official publication for the Company. It’s primary purpose is to promote Leica. My copy that was sent to me was the DEC. / JAN. 07 issue. The article that got my attention, was a featured story call Leica M8, infrared and other hitches. Page 26 story title LEICA M8 : TROUBLE IN PARADISE. It is a 14 page in depth detailed description of what’s wrong with the M8. Now keep in mind I just spent $5000 for this same camera. You will learn more about, INFRARED / BANDING / 8 AND 16 COLOR DEPTH, than you ever wanted to know. I have to say they took the subject straight on. There were even some apologies and confessions, but the entire time I was reading this article, I couldn’t help think why did they build this camera at this time, clearly they were not technically ready. There is a lot I can say about this camera and what I am experiencing right now. Unfortunately not good news. My problems are not even related to any problems they talk about in there article. That is for another time, if any one is interested. The best I can tell the article is not available on line. I do know you can buy it at there official LFI store on line. Try Goggling LFI. There you go.
 
I have an M8 myself and so far haven't been bothered with original M8 defects. once I see the pics from my M8 that's it I'm sold on it. You never really know how good your M8 is till you own one I guess. I'm enjoying my M8 and hope you'll do the same with yours.🙂
 
Point of View- get a demo copy of Lightroom- it solves most issues and allows you to unlock this cameras amazing power (I'm playing with it right now and can't bealive how much more film like my colors are). Also take a look on Flickr- M8 images are starting to roll in and besides- you don't really want an iEye do you?

: )

EDIT: Not so sure about Lightroom- after a few more hours and images it may be more "Canon" plastic like. The jurys still in deliberation- however it's tops for light fall off at the edges on wide angle lenses and will take care of color frindge when you get your IR cut filters on those seame non-coded lenses (it allows you to do what the Leica's firmware does with coded lenses post process)
 
Last edited:
Tsk..tsk. So negative. Sometimes its easy to get caught up in ones own little community's thinking, e.g. RFF.com. I bet most potential buyers don't even know about the problems that have been bandied about here and care even less. It will all turn out just fine.

/Ira
 
Topdog1 said:
Tsk..tsk. So negative. Sometimes its easy to get caught up in ones own little community's thinking, e.g. RFF.com. I bet most potential buyers don't even know about the problems that have been bandied about here and care even less. It will all turn out just fine.

/Ira
Click to expand...

Hmmm...I didn't start the thread - someone else did.

The abiding faith above, however, is interesting.

Reliance upon the "greater fool" theory perhaps.

BTW, I hear Jorge has a M8 for sale. Didn't he "petition" Leica about "fixes" just a little while before he sold this site?
 
rvaubel said:
Athena, Athena

So, just what IS your opinion of the M8? I've been trying to pick up your vibes, but you are hard to read.

Rex
....grrrr
Click to expand...

You cannot drive a car that lies at the bottom of an ocean.

Think not first of the camera model; but of its producer.

Leica is too fragile to overcome a "disappointment" - it has no othe products capable of carrying the company. Certainly, the digiback is not saving the R9.

The M8 is at best an attempt to live off a legacy - but it does not advacne it, relying as it does on already obsolete technology and failing anyway to be "the best of the best" at that. In other words, it is "disappointing".

Leica will make more money off of the Digilux than the M8. The status symbol is in those small sized (debutante purse size) P&S digis made for it by others.

The only remaining question is, what will become of the glass?
 
Gabriel M.A. said:
What ever did happen to James Bond's Lotus Esprit? He sure could have driven that car at the bottom of an ocean.
Click to expand...

The theft deterrent caused it to blow up when the bad guys tried to break into it.
 
I just received my M8. I love it and will surely be using it for years to come. Th M9? Years away. Like anything technological - there is always something better on the horizon. Either you get on board, or keep waiting and waiting and waiting.....This camera is here now and I plan on taking advantage of its image possibilities now. End of story.
 
ray_g said:
The theft deterrent caused it to blow up when the bad guys tried to break into it.
Click to expand...

So you're saying...there was a "feature" that didn't prove like a good salespitch to the stockbrokers? I guess those that don't read the instructions would sue, a big uproar on the Internet (well, BBS boards, back then)...I see.

All good things must come to an end 😛
 
Sailor Ted said:
EDIT: Not so sure about Lightroom- after a few more hours and images it may be more "Canon" plastic like. The jurys still in deliberation- however it's tops for light fall off at the edges on wide angle lenses and will take care of color frindge when you get your IR cut filters on those seame non-coded lenses (it allows you to do what the Leica's firmware does with coded lenses post process)
Click to expand...

The other thing about Lightroom, in my experience, is that once you start getting several hundred "shoots" and several thousand images in it, it slows 'WAY down. Even simple operations such as collapsing and uncollapsing the shoot list take a long, long time. I'm hoping Adobe has a fix in its magic hat for the release version.
 
jlw,
Too bad because it also solves the issue of- where did I put DNG file number 34567? Any chance of taking images out after a while?

More importantly I'm not sure if I like it's effects- I guess it's the film guy in me thinking I'm being a digital "cheat." Does it kill detail or is it in someway homogenizing its images? I'll figure this out on my own but what is the consciences assuming there is one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom