deardorff8x10
Member
As I understand it, a 21 is a 28 equivalent, but the M8 does not have 21 framelines (which would be 28 equivalnet). My M7 has 28 framelines. I assume that if I use a 21 on an M8 (on order from B&H), I will need a 28 auxillary finder.
Is this the case?
Is this the case?
kbg32
neo-romanticist
Yes, you will need the 28mm auxillary finder. The widest lens you can use on the M8 is a 24, which will bring up the proper framelines.
Grober
Well-known
Yup. My choice for 21mm is the non-Asph Elmarit which I had coded by Leica in New Jersey. (Process took four weeks @ $125.00 plus one-way shipping cost.)
I'm still waiting for the 60mm IR-cut filter promised by Leica. Once received, it will permanently reside on my 21mm. When Leica releases firmware 1.10, I should be good to go. (Always an optimist here!)
I use the Zeiss 25/28 auxiliary finder. I'm told the CV metal 28/38 finder is good too but I've never actually used one. The CV choice also has two advantages over the Zeiss: smaller size and lower cost. However, once you put the Zeiss viewfinder to your eye, there's no turning back despite it lofty price.
-g
I'm still waiting for the 60mm IR-cut filter promised by Leica. Once received, it will permanently reside on my 21mm. When Leica releases firmware 1.10, I should be good to go. (Always an optimist here!)
I use the Zeiss 25/28 auxiliary finder. I'm told the CV metal 28/38 finder is good too but I've never actually used one. The CV choice also has two advantages over the Zeiss: smaller size and lower cost. However, once you put the Zeiss viewfinder to your eye, there's no turning back despite it lofty price.
-g
SteveRD1
Well-known
I can sell you my Leica universal finder
I can sell you my Leica universal finder
I have a new in box 21/24/28 Leica finder for sale. Cost $399 new at BH, sell it for $275. Just posted it at photo.net.
I can sell you my Leica universal finder
I have a new in box 21/24/28 Leica finder for sale. Cost $399 new at BH, sell it for $275. Just posted it at photo.net.
deardorff8x10
Member
Thanks for the info. I have the 21 3.4 angulon (which will not meter). Since I have an m3 (alongside the m7) and use 28 and 35, I will get the voigtlander 28/35 finder, I guess. My m8 came today, so I will look forward to trying it all.
clarionensis
Member
21SA can be put on M8 or not? looking forward to hear your result.
Joe Mondello
Resu Deretsiger
I have 2 RF coupled CV lenses the 28 Ultron and the 40 Nokton.
The Ultron has an adapter (as it is a screw mount lens) and the 40 is natively a bayonet mount.
On the M8 the 28 brings up what seems to be an appropriate frame line while the 40 doesn't. What am I missing here? Thx.
The Ultron has an adapter (as it is a screw mount lens) and the 40 is natively a bayonet mount.
On the M8 the 28 brings up what seems to be an appropriate frame line while the 40 doesn't. What am I missing here? Thx.
Sailor Ted
Well-known
Joe,
The M8 does not have native frame lines for a 40mm lens.
The M8 does not have native frame lines for a 40mm lens.
Joe Mondello
Resu Deretsiger
Sailor Ted said:Joe,
The M8 does not have native frame lines for a 40mm lens.
Thanks, Ted.
The M8 only just arrived so I haven't even delved into the manual at all.
deardorff8x10
Member
The 21 3.4 angulon worked with the M8 (not the meter, though), but I had it set on JPEG only (still learning!), so images were compressed. I will try again with dng and try to post. I did not see vignetting on the 21, but edges seemed to have a bit of a color fringe. I will try some more and report back.
deardorff8x10
Member
images from 21 3.4 on m8
images from 21 3.4 on m8
There is some vignetting, but it is relatively mild I guess since one is using less of the edges of the lens. It sems "wider" than a 28, maybe becuase of the "drawing" aspect because the edges of the frame are further from the lense vs. a 28 (like using too much rise on a view camera)? Looks fairly sharp overall.
Using the histogram is fine for setting exposure
images from 21 3.4 on m8
There is some vignetting, but it is relatively mild I guess since one is using less of the edges of the lens. It sems "wider" than a 28, maybe becuase of the "drawing" aspect because the edges of the frame are further from the lense vs. a 28 (like using too much rise on a view camera)? Looks fairly sharp overall.
Using the histogram is fine for setting exposure
Attachments
deardorff8x10
Member
sorry - f-stop info
sorry - f-stop info
The B&W bridge was f8 the color sunrise was 3.4
sorry - f-stop info
The B&W bridge was f8 the color sunrise was 3.4
clarionensis
Member
if 21SA can be used on m8, that means 28 elmarit 1st ver can do too
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.