HuubL
hunter-gatherer
By pure chance I stumbled upon two cosmetically and functionally very nice 35mm lenses in the past two months. One is the fabled 8-element summicron, the other a summaron, both from 1966. I'll be shooting both for a while, but in the end I'll probably decide that two is one too many.
What would you do? Go for the biggest profit, sell the cron and keep a 35mm that is definitely no slough, or keep in style and sell the summaron?
What would you do? Go for the biggest profit, sell the cron and keep a 35mm that is definitely no slough, or keep in style and sell the summaron?
rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
After you have used both for a while, you will likely prefer one over the other, so I'd suggest keeping the one you like better and selling the other. Unless you need the cash, in which case, the decision becomes simpler(though more painful, perhaps.).
The summaron is M-mount, not LTM?(cause, I'd have a different suggestion other wise.
)
Rob
The summaron is M-mount, not LTM?(cause, I'd have a different suggestion other wise.
Rob
M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
Thanks Rob. Yes, 1966 >> both Mrbiemer said:After you have used both for a while, you will likely prefer one over the other, so I'd suggest keeping the one you like better and selling the other. Unless you need the cash, in which case, the decision becomes simpler(though more painful, perhaps.).
The summaron is M-mount, not LTM?(cause, I'd have a different suggestion other wise.)
Rob
02Pete
Member
I would be interested in how Magus and other forum members would compare the visual qualities of the images produced with the 8-element Summicron and the Summaron, respectively.
FrankS
Registered User
Rob, simply try both and keep your fav. Ergonomics may play a role as well. Once you have both lenses, eventually you will come to like one more than the other.
jja
Well-known
Keep the one you like better. If you decide to sell the Summaron, I'd be interested!
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
Haven't seen any images from the summaron yet, but according to many, both lenses are of equal optical quality, that is very nice for >40 year old designs. Of course the cron has one stop extra (although the summaron has one more at the other end of the diapragm scale02Pete said:I would be interested in how Magus and other forum members would compare the visual qualities of the images produced with the 8-element Summicron and the Summaron, respectively.
dll927
Well-known
Between the two choices, I think I'd rather have the"extra stop" at the open end, rather than the closed-down one. How often do you close all the way down?
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
I'd keep the faster one too.
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
I can't advise you anything, Huub...but when you decide, pls keep in mind that I am looking for a 35mm for my M2 
(although the "fabled" summicron sounds like a very expensive lens for my budget)
(although the "fabled" summicron sounds like a very expensive lens for my budget)
drewbarb
picnic like it's 1999
I've heard nothing but good things about the Summaron; I have a Summicron (an 8 element one from 1960, as luck would have it) and I know I'll never sell it. You probably can't go wrong. So I think Rob and Frank make the best sense- shoot with them both, and see which one you prefer. If the money isn't a worry, you might keep them both- but if one gets left in the bag all the time for the other, you'll have your answer.
edodo
Well-known
imho keep both, they will hold their value. The fast 35 is perhaps the keeper if you really have to sell one!
M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
FrankS
Registered User
Magus, that is a surprise response from you! I thought that you prefer the latest asph lenses?
M
Magus
Guest
Post deleted by posters request
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.