dmr
Registered Abuser
Well, I was gonna continue, but I kinda hit "submit" instead of "preview" -- oh well ...
This is a totally different experience. Totally different look and feel from the eye-level SLR or RF or P&S. The left-right reversed focusing screen does take some time to get used to. Composing in the square format kinda reminded me of the Brownie Starflash days. 🙂
Lesson 1. Be sure you have a spool to take up the film! This didn't have one! Go back to camera shop and beg one. They gave me 2, like they expect me to break it or lose it. 🙂 Not to show my real age, but the last time I shot any real roll film, the rolls were metal. These are plastic.
Lesson 2. Wind the { expletive } film after taking each shot! 🙁 I've always had the luxury of some kind of double-exposure prevention, even on the old Starflash. My first shot was that stupid self-portrait in the mirror and of course I didn't wind and double-exposed the park over it. NBD, I can always re-shoot that one.
Lesson 3. Pay more attention to composing, watch the verticals! I guess this is a learning curve. (I guess I am also gonna have to get bifocals soon too.) 🙁 With glasses I can get a good focus at waist level, but when I view up close and pop up that magnifier I have to take my glasses off and it's a pain to go back and forth. I *SWEAR* I had the camera vertical, but the frames show otherwise! 🙁
Lesson 4. This is an EX$PEN$IVE format! At US$5 and change for the film and US$8 and change for the DO/CD, that's over a dollar a frame! OUCH, very unforgiving too with 12 per roll! I'm used to thinking in terms of 35 to 40 cents per frame.
Oh well, assuming we have nice weather this weekend I'll do the other roll. I'm supposed to go antiquing with some friends on Saturday and that means to a few small towns, so I may bring the TLR along and just see what happens.
My first conclusion is that I definitely like 35mm better, but I do want to give this a fair shot before dismissing it. The dusk scenes do have both a distinct sharpness and a creamy look to them, and that is really the only difference in appearance of the shots. Those in the park could have just as well been done on 35mm except they don't show obvious grain.
Oh well, we will see ... 🙂
This is a totally different experience. Totally different look and feel from the eye-level SLR or RF or P&S. The left-right reversed focusing screen does take some time to get used to. Composing in the square format kinda reminded me of the Brownie Starflash days. 🙂
Lesson 1. Be sure you have a spool to take up the film! This didn't have one! Go back to camera shop and beg one. They gave me 2, like they expect me to break it or lose it. 🙂 Not to show my real age, but the last time I shot any real roll film, the rolls were metal. These are plastic.
Lesson 2. Wind the { expletive } film after taking each shot! 🙁 I've always had the luxury of some kind of double-exposure prevention, even on the old Starflash. My first shot was that stupid self-portrait in the mirror and of course I didn't wind and double-exposed the park over it. NBD, I can always re-shoot that one.
Lesson 3. Pay more attention to composing, watch the verticals! I guess this is a learning curve. (I guess I am also gonna have to get bifocals soon too.) 🙁 With glasses I can get a good focus at waist level, but when I view up close and pop up that magnifier I have to take my glasses off and it's a pain to go back and forth. I *SWEAR* I had the camera vertical, but the frames show otherwise! 🙁
Lesson 4. This is an EX$PEN$IVE format! At US$5 and change for the film and US$8 and change for the DO/CD, that's over a dollar a frame! OUCH, very unforgiving too with 12 per roll! I'm used to thinking in terms of 35 to 40 cents per frame.
Oh well, assuming we have nice weather this weekend I'll do the other roll. I'm supposed to go antiquing with some friends on Saturday and that means to a few small towns, so I may bring the TLR along and just see what happens.
My first conclusion is that I definitely like 35mm better, but I do want to give this a fair shot before dismissing it. The dusk scenes do have both a distinct sharpness and a creamy look to them, and that is really the only difference in appearance of the shots. Those in the park could have just as well been done on 35mm except they don't show obvious grain.
Oh well, we will see ... 🙂