David Hughes
David Hughes
This FED 1 (f) cost me US $10 (UK £6-25 in real money) on ebay but just don't ask about the postage etc.
I think it authentic as the case was dusty, the aperture ring was glued in place; the lens couldn't be removed for a long time and a lot of swearing; the film winder was stiff; the leading shutter blind is permanently curved and creased and - the real killer - it had a half used film in a reloadable cassette in it.
So assuming the lens and body match: body no. 239 xxx and so 1950 but the lens (4 digit no.) is a FED f/3·5 with unpainted engraving but it runs in the f/4·5 - f/6·3 - f/9 series. So were they still marking the old apertures in 1950? Or did they find some old parts and use them?
I've another 1 (f) exactly the same but 1951, btw.
Here's a so-so photo of the '50 Fed 1 (f).
http://idrh.smugmug.com/photos/587044968_3xE2N-L.jpg
You may not see the type 5 engraving clearly.
BTW, it's not the only one I have that I've never seen anywhere on the web... Has anyone else an odd mixture like this?
Regards, David
PS Since taking the photo I've rolled some "Blu-Tak" over the top engraving and a lot of green muck, (copper chloride?) from the usual mixture of leather and brass, has been removed. Mentioned as few people seem to know about "Blu-Tak" for camera cleaning. And a small blob on the end of a pencil will retrieve dropped screws etc from inside the works...
I think it authentic as the case was dusty, the aperture ring was glued in place; the lens couldn't be removed for a long time and a lot of swearing; the film winder was stiff; the leading shutter blind is permanently curved and creased and - the real killer - it had a half used film in a reloadable cassette in it.
So assuming the lens and body match: body no. 239 xxx and so 1950 but the lens (4 digit no.) is a FED f/3·5 with unpainted engraving but it runs in the f/4·5 - f/6·3 - f/9 series. So were they still marking the old apertures in 1950? Or did they find some old parts and use them?
I've another 1 (f) exactly the same but 1951, btw.
Here's a so-so photo of the '50 Fed 1 (f).
http://idrh.smugmug.com/photos/587044968_3xE2N-L.jpg
You may not see the type 5 engraving clearly.
BTW, it's not the only one I have that I've never seen anywhere on the web... Has anyone else an odd mixture like this?
Regards, David
PS Since taking the photo I've rolled some "Blu-Tak" over the top engraving and a lot of green muck, (copper chloride?) from the usual mixture of leather and brass, has been removed. Mentioned as few people seem to know about "Blu-Tak" for camera cleaning. And a small blob on the end of a pencil will retrieve dropped screws etc from inside the works...
Last edited: