Canon LTM 135/3.5 tests

Canon M39 M39 screw mount bodies/lenses
back alley

back alley

IMAGES
Local time
3:48 PM
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
41,289
not too sure if my hands are less steady these days or if it's the lens...all shots were taken at 125th @ 3.5 wide open, in a bit of a fog.
those are ice crystals on the needles and the leaf.

joe
 
Very sharp. I have not used mine...it is more of a just in case lens for me. And, I had to cover that focal length since the Canon IV has the adjustable magnification for it.
 
In the middle shot, I suspect your point of focus was on the far chains. It lokks like you fixed this lens!
 
interesting that it looks sharp to you guys, i hope my vision isn't a bit out of whack as they look unsharp to me.

time for an eye exam, me thinks.

joe
 
Hi,
Third picture looks very sharp and good to me. I have this lens but did not take any pictures yet! I will tale some shots with mine too!
 
I recently got one of these myself -- I'm looking forward to trying it out. (Mine's the all silver version.) It seems to balance quite well, surprisingly, on my IVF.

I guess I don't know the background -- was this lens out of adjustment before?
 
Maybe it is time for a 135mm lens test. Compare all 135mm you own. I have three right now; a Canon, a Nikon, and a Leitz.
 
Good idea, Raid. IIRC someone did that a few months ago. A canon, hektor, komura, and I think a Steinheil, if I am not mistaken.
 
KoNickon said:
I recently got one of these myself -- I'm looking forward to trying it out. (Mine's the all silver version.) It seems to balance quite well, surprisingly, on my IVF.

I guess I don't know the background -- was this lens out of adjustment before?
Click to expand...


it did not focus all the way to infinity.
 
ray_g said:
Good idea, Raid. IIRC someone did that a few months ago. A canon, hektor, komura, and I think a Steinheil, if I am not mistaken.
Click to expand...


bill m did an extensive one on 135 lenses.

i just finished shooting a scene in my basement with all 4 35mm lenses i have.
pics to follow...
 
back alley said:
bill m did an extensive one on 135 lenses.

i just finished shooting a scene in my basement with all 4 35mm lenses i have.
pics to follow...
Click to expand...

I will try to look up what Bill M did with his 135mm lenses test. I want to see what he found, and also what you found, Joe. What are your findings?

Maybe we can pool the information in to the recnt thread by rigit about the "Three 50mm Lenses" and this way have a more focused discussion thread on LTM lenses.
 
ray_g said:
Good idea, Raid. IIRC someone did that a few months ago. A canon, hektor, komura, and I think a Steinheil, if I am not mistaken.
Click to expand...

Ray,

My 135mm lenses would be as follows:

1. Leitz Elmar 135/4 Black (very old)
2. Leitz Elmar 135/4 Chrome (very old)
3. Leitz Elmarit 135/2.8
4. Canon 135/3.5
5. Nikon 135/3.5
6. Leitz Hektor 145/4.5

I use the first three lenses the most, with nice results.
 
Raid, I don't use the 135mm much on my RF's. I only have a Nikkor 135/3.5, which you already have.

I have a 135/2 canon for this focal length ;)
 
The SLR version is not difficult to find, and in FD mount is not outrageously priced as the 135/2 EF L lens.
 
Well Joe, we must need to see the same doctor. I thought I also noticed softness in the photos. I also noted fairly shallow dof; to be expected. Are these cropped much? Also, since you have the originals, are you talking about softness there? It isn't bad, nor is it consistant, so it really might just have been too much coffee or tea. How have the tests turned out where I am sure you used a tripod?
 
i think the softness is due to my hand (shakes) holding the camera on a cold day outside and my 55 years.
i have not tried it again on a tripod but just might.

i just shot my 4 35mm lenses on a tripod and will scan the negs soon. the negs seem sharper than what i'm getting handheld.
 
They certainly look good enough to me Joe, then of course with resized images sharpness is not easy to judge, you have the negs and you know how sharp they are for real ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom