1939...

M

merciful

Guest
... is when this lens was made. No coating; funny f-stops. I often wonder when using it what it shot through the decades.

Wide-open at f2.
 

Attachments

  • 05.04.10_2.jpg
    05.04.10_2.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 0
I do the same thing when using older lenses. In my case every lens I have except the new Voigtlanders are older than me. To think what images have passed through the lens, all the people who have used it and where are those pictures now.
 
It's about the same for me, too: I'm not sure about the Canon 50/1.8, but I think it's within a couple of years of me, anyway; the Leitz 90/34 predates me by 33 years.
 
My Elmar 50mm is 1933, and predates (even me) by almost 20 years - it's only had 3 owners from new and I would love to know what it has seen.

On the other hand, I have a 1943 CZ Sonnar that was issued to the Wermacht, and I don't even want to think about what that saw in its early days.....
 
Some old lenses have seen some interesting things:

From my Dad's collection:

3642730918_6baaec82e2.jpg
 
I have Zeiss 16.5cm Jena LF lens that dates back to 1913 from memory ... all I have to do is enlarge the hole in the lens board that I got from Heavystar a while ago and it's right to go on the Crown Graphic.

It truly is a thing of beauty and I can only imagine some of what it has seen!


IMG_3427.jpg
 
I have Zeiss 16.5cm Jena LF lens that dates back to 1913 from memory ... all I have to do is enlarge the hole in the lens board that I got from Heavystar a while ago and it's right to go on the Crown Graphic.

It truly is a thing of beauty and I can only imagine some of what it has seen!
It is beautiful. I'd say for a dreamer as myself it would be, and is easy to think of where it's been and what light has passed through. It's a nice thought for sure. It's pretty easy to at the very least to appreciate the workmanship of these old lenses and the fact they can still produce nice images in a very appealing way.
 
Last edited:
The attraction that old things have should not make us forget that the manufacturers of lenses, motorcycles and what have you have, over the decades, striven to make better products. Thus new is, very often, better. This is of course not true of build quality. Up to around the 1960s, most products of the industrial world were close to indestructible; but then things went down-hill pretty rapidly.
 
The attraction that old things have should not make us forget that the manufacturers of lenses, motorcycles and what have you have, over the decades, striven to make better products. Thus new is, very often, better. This is of course not true of build quality. Up to around the 1960s, most products of the industrial world were close to indestructible; but then things went down-hill pretty rapidly.

Yeh, like my Oldsmobile.
 
What gets me is that I'm often - nowadays - using a lens and camera far older than I am and so I wonder what it would have cost second-hand when I started spending serious money on new cameras in the late 50's. Then I figure I should have kept it until the Olympus 35SP came out and then waited for the M7. And an SLR or two but we need not go into that...

Hindsight's a wonderful thing to have.

Regards, David
 
These are the Leica lenses that have a certain "magic" to me... wide open with real B&W film, and these things produce images that are instant old. 🙂
 
Back
Top Bottom