dazedgonebye
Veteran
Well, first roll in a very long time.
Mostly I like it. The whole roll seemed under-exposed for some reason...and I'd rated it at 320 ISO. Could be me, could be the camera, cold be the mini-lab? I don't know.
Anyway...scans nice and as an added bonus, I really like the color. Looks like split tone prints that I've seen and liked in the past.
These were taken in the Mogollon Rim area, in the White Mountains of Arizona.
The first was with a cv75mm, the others with the color skopar 21mm.
Mostly I like it. The whole roll seemed under-exposed for some reason...and I'd rated it at 320 ISO. Could be me, could be the camera, cold be the mini-lab? I don't know.
Anyway...scans nice and as an added bonus, I really like the color. Looks like split tone prints that I've seen and liked in the past.
These were taken in the Mogollon Rim area, in the White Mountains of Arizona.
The first was with a cv75mm, the others with the color skopar 21mm.
Last edited:
nzeeman
Well-known
great shots and wonderful place is that forest. it seems that bw400cn is pretty good film.
Bryce
Well-known
Having tried this film out, I decided it was pretty nice stuff. As you say, it scans beautifully, has nice tonality, plus nice tight grain.
Unfortunately it doesn't work very well at all for wet printing, which is what happens to my best negs. Too bad about that orange mask!
Unfortunately it doesn't work very well at all for wet printing, which is what happens to my best negs. Too bad about that orange mask!
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
For some reason I seem to constantly under expose with it. Someone suggested shooting it at 200 and developing at its rated ISO ... which I now do! I really like the film though and those shots are nice! 
40oz
...
those shots look really good.
ibcrewin
Ah looky looky
I have a roll of cw400cn in right now. I'll have to try overexposing it a little see how that looks. I like the second shot too..
lewis44
Well-known
I've been using this film as well and really like it for scanning. The lab I use for processing recommended using ASA200. Here are a few pics.
Randy
Randy
Sparrow
Veteran
Nice photos Steve they look like they came from bigger negs, there looks to be no grain at all on my monitor.
How do you rate the 21mm CV’s performance at the edge of the frame, I’m thinking of getting one
How do you rate the 21mm CV’s performance at the edge of the frame, I’m thinking of getting one
anhtu
Member
great tones in those shots steve. I've never used 400CN so this is a bit of valuable information.
dazedgonebye
Veteran
I actually liked the tone of these negatives as scanned, so I did not do my usual grayscale conversion in PS.
I'm going to have to run another roll through...the "Professional" version this time...and rate it at around 200. It'll be a shame if it needs a full stop of overexosure.
Stewart,
I like that 21mm very much. I think I've hurt the sharpness of my images a couple of times by stopping down more than necessary, and by focusing much further out than necessary. So, a more thoughtful photographer should have even better results.
I'm going to have to run another roll through...the "Professional" version this time...and rate it at around 200. It'll be a shame if it needs a full stop of overexosure.
Stewart,
I like that 21mm very much. I think I've hurt the sharpness of my images a couple of times by stopping down more than necessary, and by focusing much further out than necessary. So, a more thoughtful photographer should have even better results.
boilerdoc2
Well-known
The Ilford XP2 prints in the wet darkroom a LOT easier. That way you have the best of both worlds!!!
Sparrow
Veteran
Thanks Steve, I’ve more or less decided to have one, and then came across a few posts saying it was soft in the corners, it's good to have an opinion from someone who actually has one.
You can produce any number of those duo-tones effects on a de-saturated RGB file using Curves; many hours of “fun”
You can produce any number of those duo-tones effects on a de-saturated RGB file using Curves; many hours of “fun”
Attachments
dazedgonebye
Veteran
When it comes to lenses, I'm not the most critical person Stewart. There is so much room for error on my part that I find I let the gear down far more often than it lets me down. So, I won't say that a lens that satisifes me will satisfy others with perhaps more critical standards.
One more from that roll.
One more from that roll.
Sparrow
Veteran
dazedgonebye said:
That’s as maybe but I’d prefer to have the opinion of a do’er than a talker
thanks
fishtek
Don
Good stuff, Steve!
I REALLY, REALLY want one of those 21's...
See ya!
Don
I REALLY, REALLY want one of those 21's...
See ya!
Don
popstar
Well-known
Nice photos Steve!
I like the BW400CN on occasion too. I shot this at 400 and had developed normally. I personally like how the silver platter is rendered. It's not a great photo, but shows what nice tones this film can have IMO.
Bessa R, 50mm/1.5 Nokton
I like the BW400CN on occasion too. I shot this at 400 and had developed normally. I personally like how the silver platter is rendered. It's not a great photo, but shows what nice tones this film can have IMO.
Bessa R, 50mm/1.5 Nokton
kshapero
South Florida Man
Just bought 4 rolls of BW400CN. here we go.
dazedgonebye
Veteran
kshapero said:
That's one of the things I like about this hobby. You share a little and if someone sees something they like, the enthusiasm is contagious!
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I like it that much I currently have thirty rolls in the fridge ... I really like the way this film renders tones and contrast and as said previously it scans perfectly!
Will
Well-known
It's a good film, but you need to be lucky with your minilap.
Love the first photo, Steve
Love the first photo, Steve