1st shot / CV 75/2.5 Heliar / R3M

B_Algood

B_Algood
Local time
12:07 AM
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
143
Taken at a local park..Ilford Delta Pro 100..scanned from print..
 

Attachments

  • scan0001-1.jpg
    scan0001-1.jpg
    300.5 KB · Views: 0
jmtok said:
Worse dynamic range than digital, smile very forced and unnatural. Altogether very average.


tell us how you really feel dude!

I don't think he was looking for a critique of his scanned print or shooting skills but hey, there ya go.





todd
 
jmtok said:
Worse dynamic range than digital, smile very forced and unnatural. Altogether very average.

What a sweetheart! I agree with Ray - this isn't PNet, pal...
 
jmtok said:
Worse dynamic range than digital, smile very forced and unnatural. Altogether very average.
"Apparently, I have a pickle up my a$$."
-- Charlie Mackenzie (Mike Meyers), So I Married an Axe Murderer

:p
 
Enjoy! It's an excellent lens, great for portraits and other things:

252113962_5d1e777cc5.jpg


234400550_49911fde51.jpg
 
Nice candid shot. A good example of this lens and it's ability in the hands of a competent photographer.

"Pickles up my what?" So much for reading RFF at work and
keeping my professorial dignity. ;)
 
Ok, here we go. This is my first time trying this so be gentle in your criticism of my use.


You do the lens no justice.
 
Not to be a negative nancy, but I think the first reply was on to something, he simply stated it in a terrible way.

The lighting, while probably natural, has a really artificial look to it. I think it's a combination of the angle of illumination and the fact that delta 100 is so freakin smooth and demonstrates no grain.

It may just be my display (I'm not on my normal one now) but the upper mids seem to block up in that grey and then explode into blown highlights. At first I would consider this a result of the exposure but when it comes to pleasing skin tones one must also consider the lens in question as well as the film used.

Also, what's with the crop?
 
Back
Top Bottom