dweekie
Member
After 2 years of being on the fence, I finally snagged a Contax G21 lens. I didn't get a viewfinder though :bang: .
I guess I'm taking this as an opportunity to explore other options since G users only seem to use the G finder, whereas other lens users never seem to use the G finder.
Is the G21 viewfinder worth searching for? Or is it a relic for the system with better options available elsewhere?
I guess I'm taking this as an opportunity to explore other options since G users only seem to use the G finder, whereas other lens users never seem to use the G finder.
Is the G21 viewfinder worth searching for? Or is it a relic for the system with better options available elsewhere?
kbg32
neo-romanticist
You can use any 21mm finder. It doesn't matter. The 21 G originally was sold with the finder as a set.
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
The Contax 21mm finder is excellent but you can certainly use another brand. The Zeiss is the nicest I've ever seen.
Robert Lai
Well-known
Try the Cosina Voigtlander 21mm finder. Metal, has 25mm frame marks in it also, and not expensive. Stephen Gandy sells them.
gshybrid
Well-known
I have a VC viewfinder I don't need... I sent you a PM.
axiom
Non-Registered User
I have both the G21 finder and VC metal 21mm finder.
The VC one offers bigger and brighter image IMO.
But the G21 feels more contrasty
The VC one offers bigger and brighter image IMO.
But the G21 feels more contrasty
sepiareverb
genius and moron
I use the Leica Frankenfinder with all extra-wides on all my RF cameras. Stunning finder with a very visible and useful bubble, as well as adjustable framelines as one gets closer to the subject. Impeccably built. Bubble not absolutley necessary for a 21 I suppose, but helpful at times. Just out the other day with the G2/21/Frankenfinder. Perhaps overkill if the 21 is your only very wide lens. Probably costs more than the 21 did...
awilder
Alan Wilder
The ZM 21 finder is by FAR the best 21 finder ever made and I suspect even better than the Contax G version. The CV finder is OK but has more distortion with less brightness, something you'd appreciate in framing a poorly lit subject.
kzphoto
Well-known
I picked p a G21 about a week ago that came with the viewfinder. The view isn't as bright as the ZM finder and it has a cross hair in the middle of the finder. It may be distracting for some, but I use it on my Ricoh GRD IV with the little accessory lens and it makes a good looking kit. If you can find a cheap G21 finder, buy it. The Leica and ZM equivalents are only very slightly better and you would need to have them side by side to notice.
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
Nice! I hope the VF you got was in decent shape 
Great idea using it on the GRD!
KD
Great idea using it on the GRD!
KD
kzphoto said:I picked p a G21 about a week ago that came with the viewfinder. The view isn't as bright as the ZM finder and it has a cross hair in the middle of the finder. It may be distracting for some, but I use it on my Ricoh GRD IV with the little accessory lens and it makes a good looking kit. If you can find a cheap G21 finder, buy it. The Leica and ZM equivalents are only very slightly better and you would need to have them side by side to notice.
john_s
Well-known
Try the Cosina Voigtlander 21mm finder. Metal, has 25mm frame marks in it also, and not expensive. Stephen Gandy sells them.
While the 25mm frames could be a handy addition to the current VC 21mm viewfinder, I prefer the older one because I find the extra framelines clutter the view.
Bob Michaels
nobody special
I find finders to be very non critical. Any one will serve the purpose.
I used the ContaxG 21mm finder with that system and 21mm Biogon for years. I now use the CV finder with a CV 21mm lens. Either finder is more than adequate. Buy based on price because it will make no difference in your photos.
I used the ContaxG 21mm finder with that system and 21mm Biogon for years. I now use the CV finder with a CV 21mm lens. Either finder is more than adequate. Buy based on price because it will make no difference in your photos.
raid
Dad Photographer
I also find the finders not to be a critical factor in photography. I use a 20mm finder with a 19m lens and also a 21mm lens. I use what I get my hands on.
dweekie
Member
Wow, I didn't realize viewfinders were so personal, even compared to lenses!
Thank you for all the responses. It seems the consensus is that the G21 viewfinder does not bring anything to the table (other than matching color) compared to other options. gshybrid offered a plastic voigtlander at a good price. If that falls through, I think the metal voigtlander 21/25 is perfect for me since I have a ZM25 as well (though only on the GXR for now).
The Zeiss is extremely appealing, but I just can't justify the price for my own use.
Thank you for all the responses. It seems the consensus is that the G21 viewfinder does not bring anything to the table (other than matching color) compared to other options. gshybrid offered a plastic voigtlander at a good price. If that falls through, I think the metal voigtlander 21/25 is perfect for me since I have a ZM25 as well (though only on the GXR for now).
The Zeiss is extremely appealing, but I just can't justify the price for my own use.
thegman
Veteran
After 2 years of being on the fence, I finally snagged a Contax G21 lens. I didn't get a viewfinder though :bang: .
I guess I'm taking this as an opportunity to explore other options since G users only seem to use the G finder, whereas other lens users never seem to use the G finder.
Is the G21 viewfinder worth searching for? Or is it a relic for the system with better options available elsewhere?
If you're interested, I have a Leica 21mm finder for sale, not put it in the classifieds yet, but PM me if interested.
Crazy Fedya
Well-known
I have picked up 21mm f/4.5 Biogon for my Contax RF's, and am thinking about getting either Zeiss 440 turret finder, or original 21mm finder,that came with said Biogon. Any opinions on these two?
Normally, I use KMZ turret finder, Nikon and Leitz 35-135, and find them adequate, so dimness of them don't really bother me, since they are for reference, for the most part. I am just wondering about the difference between said two finders at 21mm.
Normally, I use KMZ turret finder, Nikon and Leitz 35-135, and find them adequate, so dimness of them don't really bother me, since they are for reference, for the most part. I am just wondering about the difference between said two finders at 21mm.
Crazy Fedya
Well-known
Also, have anyone tried this one?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/21mm-viewfi...pt=US_Viewfinders_Eyecups&hash=item2a1d277a70
http://www.ebay.com/itm/21mm-viewfi...pt=US_Viewfinders_Eyecups&hash=item2a1d277a70
dogbunny
Registered Boozer
Regardless of quality, which is the most compact? I didn't mind by Avenon at first, a little annoyed with it atm.
kzphoto
Well-known
I think the CV finders are definitely the most compact. The G21 finder is huge in comparison to the ZM and Leica equivalents.
@Kent: The finder is superb! I use it on my GRD IV with the little accessory lens. It makes a pretty match!
@Kent: The finder is superb! I use it on my GRD IV with the little accessory lens. It makes a pretty match!
kbg32
neo-romanticist
Also, have anyone tried this one?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/21mm-viewfi...pt=US_Viewfinders_Eyecups&hash=item2a1d277a70
I have no idea what that is. It looks like some "cobbled" viewfinder. I especially like the electrical tape mask on the front element.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.