David Hughes
David Hughes
24 makes sense but good ones cost a fortune. Other than that it's very much a personal matter.
Regards, David
Regards, David
The 28mm is too close to my 35mm for my taste and shooting style.
I use a 24mm with my 35mm on my SLR.
I use a 21mm with my 35mm on my Leica rangefinders.
The 21mm and the 24mm focal lengths both work well with my 35mm lens.
You won't know until you try both. User experience is non-transferable.
I have my M262 + Voigtlander 35/1.2. I would like my next acquisition to be a used wider lens. I am thinking the 28 is too close to 35 and would like to find a 24. I think I have read that the 24 is useable without a separate viewfinder and that the limits of the 262's viewfinder just about coincides with the 24 field of view. Do any of you use a 24 this way? An auxiliary viewfinder would entail removing my Thumbs Up each time I used it and I'm too lazy for that.
I have a Zeiss 25mm 2.8 and a Leica 28mm 2.8 I can take samples of for you if you are interested. I use the 25mm without a viewfinder and it's usable.
And I think you will have more fun with the 24mm than with the 28mm. The 24 lies at the threshold of "extreme wide angle" more so than the 28mm.