Rayt
Nonplayer Character
Which 50mm do you recommend for general photography? Both seem to cost the same and are about the same size. Thanks in advance.
Both are considered excellent. I have the 50/2 in LTM mount and it is a great lens. The 1.4 lens is optimized for wide open close range photography. Perhaps that makes the 2.0 a better general purpose lens.
Good time to pick up S-Mount lenses!
Both are sharp. I favor the F1.4 lens. VERY sharp, and I have never been dissappointed with distance shots, stopped down. The F2 is a fine lens.
But, prices being the same, weight is "about" the same, contrast/sharpness about the same, the faster lens gives an extra stop which is a definite advantage in low light.
Both are sharp. I favor the F1.4 lens. VERY sharp, and I have never been dissappointed with distance shots, stopped down. The F2 is a fine lens.
But, prices being the same, weight is "about" the same, contrast/sharpness about the same, the faster lens gives an extra stop which is a definite advantage in low light.
VinceC
Veteran
If the prices are the same, you might as well get the extra stop with the 1.4. I don't yet have an f/2 version, but Dante Stella's article says the 1.4 and the 2 have nearly identical performance when the 1.4 is stopped down to f/2.
If "bokeh" is important to you, the f/2 version is reportedly smoother. The 1.4 can get very harsh in some situations.
If "bokeh" is important to you, the f/2 version is reportedly smoother. The 1.4 can get very harsh in some situations.
Rayt
Nonplayer Character
Thanks for the replies. I'll go for the 50/1.4. By the way I see "Olympic" 50's selling on fleabay for over $2000. Are these things that great?!? 
No: They are more collectible. For that price, buy a chrome S3-2000 with its 50mm/1.4 lens. That is essentially the multi-coated version of the Olympic lens.
The older lens is a Sonnar formula, is smaller, and is very sharp. It goes for about 1/10th the price that you mention.
Wide-Open:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=17345
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=17346
Stopped-down to F4.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=17347
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=17348
See this thread to compare with a Canon 50mm/1.4, lens number 1, which is a "planar" formula.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16568
The older lens is a Sonnar formula, is smaller, and is very sharp. It goes for about 1/10th the price that you mention.
Wide-Open:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=17345
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=17346
Stopped-down to F4.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=17347
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=17348
See this thread to compare with a Canon 50mm/1.4, lens number 1, which is a "planar" formula.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16568
Meleica
Well-known
I have a beautiful, later model black and chrome 50mm 1.4 Nikkor, for sale. Lens glass is mint-, no questions about it. It's from a beautiful S3 I bought, but I already have 2 other 50/1.4's. Comes with correct front plastic cap ( although one pin is off the cap - but no effect ). Not cheap, because this lens glass is really MINT- Glass beuatiful, no oil on the blades, smooth focus, slightest wear to barrel... $ 299 shipped in US
Dan
Dan
Last edited: