It'd be close, but the trouble is that whilst 105mm is very close to the theoretical `normal' lens of 90mm x 60mm, 50mm is in fact slightly longer than normal on 36mm x 24mm.
The diagonal of 6x9 is 108mm or thereabouts. The diagonal of 35mm is actually roughly 43mm instead of 50mm as you'd expect. The reason for this... well according to
Wikipedia, Barnack chose it
`as a compromise between the theoretical value and good sharpness, as lens technology at the time was such that slightly longer focal lengths were able to achieve optimum sharpness.'
If you divide the diagonals together, you work out the multiplier to get equivalent focal lengths; 108mm / 43mm = 2.5 or so. 2.5 * 50 = 125. So your 50mm finder would be showing approximately the view you'd get with a 125mm lens on a 6x9 camera.
However, given the horrible viewfinders on most 6x9 folders (my Agfa Record III is appalling!), the 50mm finder would probably still give better framing accuracy anyway! You'd get a touch extra on your negative than you might expect but with 6x9, resolution isn't exactly an issue, and if it's a nice bright-line finder then you could look outside the framelines a fraction anyway.
You can check viewfinder accuracy with some frosted tape or ground glass across the film gate. Point camera at a wall, use bits of black tape on the wall to mark out the corners of the viewfinder and check results on the ground glass.