davidwau
Newbie
Hello everyone,
A lovely R3a and Nokton 40mm arrived last week from the good folks at Mainline Photographics here in Australia. It's my first rangefinder (well second - but my 3 month affair with a Leica CL hardly counts due to consistent malfunction and the meter dying).
Coming from a Nikon Fe2 and the like, it's been interesting to compare the RF to SLR's. Firstly I have to say I love everything about the R3a but know it will take time to get used to focusing and the 40mm framelines - which are a little awkward to see. That said, my first film is still to come back and I probably should just use the full frame for composition anyway. Love the focal length but wonder if I should have bought a 50mm instead?
Slightly dissapointing is the fact that my Fe2 with 50mm f1.8 seems brighter than the RF, and I was also suprised that the weight of both units seems similar. The shutter sound (noise level) is similar to my ears. I would have expected the RF to be noticably quieter... but then, I am assuming an M would be! One day perhaps.
I miss the size, weight and feel of the CL a little bit, but then I am saving for the rapidwinder which seems to improve the hold according to reports on this forum.
Anyway, despite a few minor dissapointments, I am looking forward to a happy long-term relationship. I certainly don't regret giving up on my digital outfit (despite being employed as a graphic designer speciailising in retouching!) and have never enjoyed photography more. No disrepect to Canon (who make great gear of course) but if I ever have to look through another 20D... aagghhh!
Thanks to everyone for the knowledge I've gained from all the posts, and I look forward to share some piccies and thoughts in the future.
David
A lovely R3a and Nokton 40mm arrived last week from the good folks at Mainline Photographics here in Australia. It's my first rangefinder (well second - but my 3 month affair with a Leica CL hardly counts due to consistent malfunction and the meter dying).
Coming from a Nikon Fe2 and the like, it's been interesting to compare the RF to SLR's. Firstly I have to say I love everything about the R3a but know it will take time to get used to focusing and the 40mm framelines - which are a little awkward to see. That said, my first film is still to come back and I probably should just use the full frame for composition anyway. Love the focal length but wonder if I should have bought a 50mm instead?
Slightly dissapointing is the fact that my Fe2 with 50mm f1.8 seems brighter than the RF, and I was also suprised that the weight of both units seems similar. The shutter sound (noise level) is similar to my ears. I would have expected the RF to be noticably quieter... but then, I am assuming an M would be! One day perhaps.
I miss the size, weight and feel of the CL a little bit, but then I am saving for the rapidwinder which seems to improve the hold according to reports on this forum.
Anyway, despite a few minor dissapointments, I am looking forward to a happy long-term relationship. I certainly don't regret giving up on my digital outfit (despite being employed as a graphic designer speciailising in retouching!) and have never enjoyed photography more. No disrepect to Canon (who make great gear of course) but if I ever have to look through another 20D... aagghhh!
Thanks to everyone for the knowledge I've gained from all the posts, and I look forward to share some piccies and thoughts in the future.
David